Do you think you would ever have heard of Christianity if the Apostles had gone out and said, ‘I believe in consensus?’ — Margaret Thatcher

The ‘Mountain of Evidence’ For Evolution

May 25, 2013   ·   By   ·   1 Comments

evolutionEvolutionists want everyone to believe their idea is a fact. Evolutionists cultivate a perception that there is a “mountain of evidence” that is monolithic, that proves beyond any doubt that evolution is a fact.

The reality is much, much different.

The fact is that the overwhelming majority of “evidence” for evolution is nothing more than assumption and interpretation.

In most cases, the guesses and interpretations of the evidence for evolution can actually be interpreted another way, and usually fits better in a creationist framework.

Of course, it helps to maintain that facade of “fact” if the academic, scientific and media community continues the con that anything associated with evolution doctrine is “scientific” and anything associated with creation or intelligent design is “superstition.”

Actually, evolution doctrine is no more scientific than creationism. Neither creationists nor evolutionists were around when the universe and the earth formed, or when life of any kind first began, or when the lands and oceans took on their current form. Both creationists and evolutionists must attempt to interpret the available evidence and make a guess as to what actually happened.

In fact, evolution, materialism and naturalism are LESS scientific than creationism.

You see, empirical science has told us certain things: matter does not come into existence from nothing, life does not spring into existence from lifeless materials, matter does not spontaneously organize itself into more organized, complex and functional forms, and one organism does not spontaneously give rise to another type of organism.

This means that all the major tenets required for evolution to be true are IMPOSSIBLE scientifically.

Yet in the framework of creation science, all of these things are possible because creation science assumes a supernatural intelligence and power which operates beyond and independent of the laws of science of our universe, and that supernatural intelligence is capable of carrying out all the things which are impossible according to the laws of science.

Therefore, creation science is a viable theory, where evolution is a self-contradictory one. Any idea which contradicts itself cannot be true.

Check out this evidence of Creation Magazine Live to learn more of the specifics about the “mountain of evidence” for evolution. They’ll also talk about how the intelligentsia brutally “stacks the deck” and will allow only their own guesses to be considered as “evidence.” I guess you have to do that when you’re desperate to win and you know your emperor is naked.

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Bob Ellis has been the owner of media company Dakota Voice, LLC since 2005. He is a 10-year veteran of the United States Air Force, a political writer for the past decade, and has been involved in numerous election and public policy campaigns for nearly 20 years, including a Tea Party leader and organizer since 2009. He lives in Rapid City, South Dakota with his wife and two children.
Bob Ellis
View all articles by Bob Ellis
Leave a comment with your Facebook login
Print Friendly
  • Tim Langan

    Fabulous article!!

Featured Articles


Latest South Dakota Economic Development Office Report Released


South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard today released the results of an independent audit of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED). The audit was conducted by the Department of Legislative Audit, state government’s independent accounting agency that reports to the state Legislature, not the Executive Branch.


Feckless House Republicans: Punt on Debt Ceiling, Power of Purse

Robert Romano

Last August, before a partial government shutdown occurred in the ill-fated attempt to defund Obamacare, House Republican leaders were reportedly urging their conference to just wait for the debt ceiling, that that would be the time to achieve some concessions. Apparently, what House leaders finally determined could be accomplished on the debt ceiling was in fact nothing.


Local Schools and the Incentive for Federal Largess

Bob Ellis

According to a Rapid City Journal article, an elementary school just outside Rapid City in Blackhawk will lose $200,000 in federal funding next year. The money is for math and literacy programs, but it is tied to student participation in the free and reduced lunch program. Witness the incentive to grow federal largess.


Feb. 13 South Dakota Amber Alert: Two Children


On 02-12-2014 at 11:10 pm the suspect, Skye Burnham-Endicott, trespassed on the property where Tayloni and Layla's mother was living and violently assaulted the mother at her home in Rapid City, SD. Following the assault, Skye took the children from their home. Skye has no custodial rights to the children and threatened to kill the children and made suicidal threats.

Scott Walker (Photo credit:

Scott Walker: Yes, It Can Happen Here

Rick Manning

It can’t happen here. Government targeting and intimidation against political opponents is something found in North Korea or Iran, not in the United States of America. Tell that to conservative groups in the state of Wisconsin whose leaders have had their private homes raided by local police due to their attempts to support Gov. Scott Walker (R) during the labor unions’ failed attempt at recalling him from office.


"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964