The social fabric that binds America together as one has always been fragile, and to complete the fundamental transformation that Obama strives to achieve, it must be torn asunder from top to bottom in a wholesale surrender of the current rule of law to another set of laws composed not through consent, compromise and agreement, but instead through forced acquiescence.

100% of black people who weren’t acting like a thug today did NOT get shot by the police. 100% of black people who live according to the accepted standards of behavior developed by every human society known to man – you know, don’t beat people up, or physically intimidate them; don’t steal from them; don’t threaten them with violence; don’t ignore the basic, accepted rules of society like showing respect for the rights of others, etc. – never get shot by the police.

We know what it looks like when individuals rebel against the Law of God - it results in a condition where neither your property, nor your liberty and not even your life are secure from robbery, kidnapping and murder. And one of the contributing factors to a society where God’s Law is rejected by the people is when the leaders themselves reject God’s Law.

On December 21, Secretary of State Shantel Krebs announced that an Initiated Amendment to the South Dakota Constitution to Expand Rights for Crime Victims was validated and certified to be on the November 2016 general election ballot as a ballot measure that the citizens will vote on.

When in doubt, pass more laws. Instead of examining the root causes behind increasing gun violence in America, apply an ill-conceived, legally questionable legislative solution that will rob law abiding Americans of their constitutional rights while doing nothing to prevent criminals from doing what they do best

One of the worst ideas that the Obama administration has proposed, making it harder for employers to obtain legal advice, is apparently moving forward. On Dec. 7, the U.S. Department of Labor submitted a draft final regulation to the White House for review which would do exactly that, assuming that the draft contains the provisions found in the proposed rule.

When Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. encouraged students to be proficient in firearms, the left-wing gun-grabbers, Stockholm Syndrome-suffering Islamist sympathizers and well-meaning, though woefully misguided, “nicer-than-Jesus” Christians lost their collective noodle. Chief among them, and dog-paddling neck-deep in crocodile tears, was Hillary Clinton.

As I mentioned a few days ago when I discussed the 52 year old married man with children who became a six year old girl (in his mind), modern culture has sadly “progressed” beyond the point where you can discount even the most outrageously unlikely claim about what someone is doing or allowing.

New details of the 14 dead in San Bernardino are emerging, and there are some heartbreaking ironies, as well as stories of heroism and courage. For example, Bennetta Betbadal, 46, was a Catholic who fled Islamic extremism in Iran, only to be killed by an Islamic extremist in the United States.” But is it extremism?

I do not mean to be crass with my title, but for a few decades now I have noticed many anti-American sentiments around the topic of innocent Americans protecting themselves. None of these sentiments are logical; none of them are ethical; and certainly none of them have prevented weapons from taking the life of the innocent they are claiming to protect!