Do you think you would ever have heard of Christianity if the Apostles had gone out and said, ‘I believe in consensus?’ — Margaret Thatcher

No_Mike_Rounds_bn

EPA Destroying American Energy

June 3, 2014   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

US_nightThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced new regulations that place at risk something Americans all now take for granted—turning the lights on.

After “Cap-and-Trade” bills failed to attract even modest traction when his Party had a supermajority, President Barack Obama made good on his promise to step over the will of the American people in his vendetta against American energy. Taking specific aim at coal-fired power plants, Obama’s EPA is attempting to mandate that all fossil fuel power plants must reduce their emissions by 30 percent before the year 2030. This blow comes in the wake of recent regulations from the EPA that make building new power plants — that can operate on American coal — prohibitively expensive.

Together, these regulations have the bite to purge a natural American resource that powered 37 percent of all domestic energy in 2012, with enough coal lying naturally on American soil to power the nation for over 500 years, at current rates of usage.

And America’s energy infrastructure after six years of being hyper-regulated by Obama’s EPA is ill-prepared for the consequences.

American electricity spare capacity — the difference between generation and end use — was narrowed between 2007 and 2012 from 115 billion kWh to 58 billion kWh, respectively—a staggering 49.5 percent drop over a five-year period. The United States is in no way capable of facing the arbitrary annihilation of a prominent energy producer at a time when “renewable” energy sources have been proven to be presently unable to scale to broad portions of the economy, and spare electrical grid capacity are half of what they were in 2007. If these new EPA rules are allowed to be fully implemented, Americans will likely face a very immediate reality that the power will simply no longer be available on demand.

At a time when the United States is at the precipice of attaining true energy independence through the development of new resources with enough domestic energy available to power a dynamic American economy into the indefinite future, Barack Obama is squandering a chance to make this energy resurgence a positive cornerstone of his Presidential legacy; instead opting to score quick political points with his extreme environmentalist supporters.

Obama has chosen immediate expedient regression over a legacy of enabling hard-earned, long-term American progress, putting the American standard of life at risk in the process.

And lest anyone frame this decision as “progressive,” Obama’s new regulations foundationally compromise FDR’s famed 1935 Rural Electrification initiative, which delivered electricity to previously unreached, rural areas of the United States, raising millions of Americans’ standard of living to 20th century norms. Over the coming years, the coal-fired plants that power these rural regions very well may cease to exist. And to pile on, the consequential cost increases of energy from these regulations (cost increases Obama has openly admitted to being an inevitable outcome of this energy policy) will disproportionately hurt families in the economic middle and lower-classes.

One imagines economically disadvantaged rural families caring very little about unnoticeable carbon dioxide reductions in the air when forced to make a decision between meals with vegetables and paying the electric bill. “Progress” indeed.

True, if the United States hopes to progress into another century of rigorous growth and technical innovation, it will need a fully functional electrical grid uncompromised by the whims of elitist regulators serving an anti-economic growth master.

But more importantly, if you want to continue taking for granted that flicking switches on the wall will reliably produce light, climate control, and smart phone charging, the time to stop this radical administration from depleting America’s standard of living is now.


This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.


Similar Posts:

Tom Toth is the Social Media Director for Americans for Limited Government. A communications and public policy professional, Tom is a regular contributor and webmaster for NetRightDaily.com and he manages the social media presence for ALG. Tom is a graduate of Liberty University and lives in Alexandria, VA with his wife.
Tom Toth
View all articles by Tom Toth
Leave a comment with your Facebook login
Print Friendly

Readers Comments (0)


Sorry, comments are closed on this post.

Featured Articles

We_Have_Met_the_Enemy

FDR’s Second Bill of Rights

Michael Peroutka

Back in January, 1944, just four years before Walt Kelly's Pogo first appeared, President Franklin Roosevelt, in his annual address to Congress, set the nation on a path that would destroy America as the founders envisioned it. The plan he declared to the nation in that speech was destined, if not designed, to make America its own enemy.

fist

The Police State: Follow Orders or Resist?

John W. Whitehead

The perils of resisting the police state grow more costly with each passing day, especially if you hope to escape with your life and property intact. The thing you must remember is that we’ve entered an age of militarized police in which we’re no longer viewed as civilians but as enemy combatants.

Man in despair over bills

SOS: Speaking of Seniors - Helping a Portage Widow

Woodrow Wilcox

On October 6, 2014, a widow came to my office for help with medical bills. The woman is from Portage, Indiana. So far, the bills totaled almost $3,000. Her husband had passed away less than four weeks before our meeting and she was worried because she was getting medical bills regarding services during his last few days alive.

Supreme Court

In Defense of Marriage: Civil Disobedience on a Massive Scale

Guest Author

Yesterday's action by the Supreme Court only solidifies the idea that the powerful elites who dominate politics, media and culture do not care what the people think, expressed through the ballot box or their elected state legislators. And if "We the People's" votes do not count, then We live not in freedom but under tyranny.

Marijuana joint (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Study: Another Nail in the ‘Safe’ Marijuana Coffin

Bob Ellis

The evidence just continues to mount that marijuana is not the wonderful, benevolent plant that potheads claim it is. Not that there has been a dearth of that information in the past, since for years I have remarked on factual data about its dangers, including traffic deaths, mental health issues, psychosis, schizophrenia, other psychotic symptoms and other health dangers. Then, of course, there are the wonderful things pot use does for productivity and responsible use of the taxpayer's dollars.

Archives




"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964