Is there no virtue among us? If there is not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks, no form of government, can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical (imaginary; fanciful or vainly conceived) idea. — James Madison

No_Mike_Rounds_bn

Democrats Prefer ‘Political Equality’ to Freedom

June 20, 2014   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

Photo credit: Joshua Sherurcij

Photo credit: Joshua Sherurcij

This is not a joke.

The Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on The Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, led by Saturday Night Live comedian turned politician Al Franken, voted unanimously against the exact language contained in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  This marks perhaps the first time elected officials have officially voted against the basic freedoms that have been the backbone of our individual liberties for more than 225 years.

The Subcommittee’s website claims that their jurisdiction is:  “(1) Constitutional amendments; (2) Enforcement and protection of constitutional rights; (3) Statutory guarantees of civil rights and civil liberties; (4) Separation of powers; (5) Federal-State relations; (6) Interstate compacts; (7) Human rights laws and practices; (8) Enforcement and implementation of human rights laws.”

Apparently, the Democrats who voted against the First Amendment did not read their own website as their efforts to overturn the Citizen’s United Supreme Court decision overturning onerous restrictions on political free speech go directly counter to their mission statement to enforce and protect constitutional rights.

Rather than accept the Court’s decision or waiting for a future Court to review it, Senate Democrats are moving forward with an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would specifically allow Congress to make laws that restrict the right to petition the government under the dubious, newly created “fundamental principle of political equality for all.”

This idea of political equality for all is at its core an allowance for Congress to prohibit any political activity that it deemed to be above and beyond what the least interested and involved person might engage in.

This differs from the core First Amendment principle that everyone has the positive right to redress their grievances with the government as it would allow Congress to determine and define what the government itself deemed to be reasonable actions of redress that ensured political equality.

This concept of the government determining the level, if any, redress that will be allowed turns the entire concept of petitioning the federal government for redress on its head.

The moment elected officials empower themselves to dictate the means of seeking change in policy, the ability to create change is eviscerated, and it is that very political speech that the First Amendment protects.

The Democrats destruction of American political freedom amendment, Senate Joint Resolution 19, now moves to the full Judiciary Committee where it is expected to pass on a partisan vote.  The Resolution is not expected to meet the threshold for amending the Constitution on the floor of the Senate which requires a 2/3 majority of 67 votes.

Senator Ted Cruz, the brilliant defender of Constitutional freedoms, is expected to continue fighting against the Democratic Party partisan power play by forcing every Democrat to go on record voting against the language contained in the First Amendment as the process allows.  Cruz summarized his beliefs at the hearing saying, ““I have more faith in the Bill of Rights than I do any elected official.”

To that I say, Amen Senator Cruz, Amen.  Unfortunately Stuart Smalley doesn’t agree.


This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.


Similar Posts:

Rick Manningis the Vice President of Public Policy and Communications for Americans for Limited Government and the former Public Affairs Chief of Staff for the U.S. Department of Labor. Americans for Limited Governmentis dedicated to putting the principles of limited government into action. They work with local groups across the nation to promote freedom, limited government, and the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to harness the power of American citizens and grassroots groups in order to put the people back in charge in states across the country.
Rick Manning
View all articles by Rick Manning
Leave a comment with your Facebook login
Print Friendly

Readers Comments (0)


Sorry, comments are closed on this post.

Featured Articles

protest_b

Five Lessons from the Whiskey Rebellion

David John Marotta

The earliest and first U.S. tax-inspired revolt was the 1791 Whiskey Rebellion. The federal government, just two years old, was $54 million in debt from the American Revolution. Another $25 million was owed by the states. Combined, the debt was the equivalent of $1.975 trillion in today's dollars.

ObamaCare_f

Every Voter Should Understand This

Woodrow Wilcox

If your congressman or senator voted for the Affordable Health Care Act (“Obamacare”), then you should understand this. A vote for “Obamacare” was a vote to cut funding of Medicare by $716 billion dollars. That is the figure given in a two year study by the Government Accounting Office that was published in July 2012.

F. S. Church painting of Pandora trying to close the box that she had opened out of curiosity

What the ‘Gay Marriage’ Debate is Really About

J. Matt Barber

It’s called Pandora’s Box. And the Supreme Court just opened it. Did you actually think the debate over “gay marriage” was about marriage? At its core, this increasingly heated fight over “gay marriage” is about two diametrically opposed and profoundly incompatible views of reality (or lack thereof).

Mike Huckabee ({Photo credit: David Ball)

Hey Mike, What Took You So Long???

A.J. Castellitto

Mr. Huckabee is threatening defection from the Republican Party over "social issues," even going so far as suggesting he would take part in a 3rd Party Revolt. My only question to Mr. Huckabee is, 'What took you so long?'

Thom_Tillis

Will blacks in North Carolina, and elsewhere, stop buying the liberal line?

Star Parker

Tillis is an experienced legislator and solid conservative. So what’s the problem? One issue is the volatile black vote. Not volatile as to their consistency to vote for Democrats but whether or not they show up to vote.

Archives




"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964