Bernie Sanders: The ‘Legal’ Criminal

gun_crimeImagine you and I are strolling down the street one fine day on our way to have a nice lunch and we come across a woman who is truly destitute.  She needs many things including food to feed her baby.  Imagine also that you just cashed a check and you know, and I know, that you have $200.00 in your pocket.

Now imagine that I decide that you should give the $200.00 dollars to the woman. (Remember, she is truly needy.)  So I take out my handgun and I order you, at gunpoint, to turn over the $200.00 to the woman.

Not wanting your brains splattered all over the street, you comply, but it’s not over.  Let’s just say that I am so moved by this woman’s situation that I order you to come to my house tomorrow and the next day and every day until you die and give me more money so that I can provide for her and her children and her grandchildren indefinitely.  Furthermore, I make it clear to you that if you do not do as I command, I will use force against you and your loved ones.

Ted Cruz 2016

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, if I behaved this way toward you, I would be acting criminally because I have no right to force you to part with your property even if the cause is a worthy one. The question then becomes, would this action on my part be legal and righteous if it was done not just by me, but collectively? Let’s say, everybody on the whole street agrees that we should take your money and give it to the needy woman.  Is there any moral principle that makes COLLECTIVE force acceptable when the use of force INDIVIDUALLY would be a crime?

The answer is, of course, no.

Now since men are fallen creatures and work is required for making a profit it will naturally occur to some that it may take less effort to steal the profit that other individuals earn rather than to take the time and expend the effort to earn profit for themselves.  Unfortunately people will tend to do this so long as the effort and risk are minimal.

Woodrow Wilcox

ADVERTISEMENT

Tragically those we trust with authority have the same fallen nature with the same temptation to steal and it is both common and natural that they will invent “laws” which allow them to steal the profit and the substance of others by means of the very laws they have created.

Let’s be clear, this is exactly what Bernie Sanders desires to impose on America.  In contradiction to your charitable giving, the spoils of Bernie’s plunder will be awarded to whomever he decides.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? In the first place, it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.  When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.  These two evils are of equal consequence.

Out of our love of our Country and for the honor of God, we must weed out the evil of socialism… first in our own thinking, and then, in our civil government.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and the Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.



This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.


Similar Posts:

Jake MacAulay serves as the Chief Operating Officer of the Institute on the Constitution (IOTC), an educational outreach that presents the founders’ “American View” of law and government. The former co-host of the syndicated talk show, The Sons of Liberty, he is an ordained minister and has spoken to audiences nation-wide, and has established the American Club, a constitutional study group in public and private schools.
Jake MacAulay
View all articles by Jake MacAulay
Print Friendly

CareNet

  • Billy Davis

    How bout the radical idea of your tax dollars working for you instead of giving corporate entities breaks?

    • http://www.americanclarion.com/ Bob Ellis

      How about the radical idea of limiting government to its constitutional boundaries?