Pro-Abortion Crowd Becoming More Aggressive

Grandma_abortionBy Zachary Gappa
John Jay Institute Center for a Just Society

There is a new theme emerging in the media: an explicit attempt to normalize abortion to a degree we haven’t seen before. Pro-choice advocates were once content to refer to abortion as an unfortunate necessity, but in the face of pro-life gains in legal and cultural fronts, pro-choicers are going for broke on a new strategy: flaunt your abortion.

The Twitter trend #shoutyourabortion is the most obvious and dumbed-down version of this trend. But other instances in the past few years are numerous.

In movies you have the romantic comedy Obvious Child which centers on a young comedian’s choice to kill her unborn child.  A choice faced mostly with bluntness and pragmatism, along with plenty of laughs.

There’s the new film Grandma about foul-mouthed grandmother Lily Tomlin taking her granddaughter around the country as they hit up friends for money to pay for the granddaughter’s abortion.

And then there’s TV. Abortion has made appearances on a variety of shows lately, but none have been as brash as Scandal, which boldly played the song Silent Night as the title character had her child aborted rather than inconvenience her career (she ended the scene with a faint smile; the actors fell over themselves praising the episode).

This is the new line abortion activists are pushing. Their goal has gone beyond ensuring that a woman can legally kill her child. Taking a page out of the gay marriage movement, they are now demanding affirmation and rejoicing in their liberating killing. They used to argue for abortion as a sad but necessary freedom. No longer. Now it’s presented as normal. Ordinary. Something to connect about with other women. Funny even.

Why would pro-choicers argue for such an extreme position? It’s a fearful reaction against years of pro-life changes and sentiments.  The past five years have realized over 250 pro-life legal restrictions on abortion passed in states across the country. Middle America (read as nearly every state outside of the northeast and the west coast) has taken significant steps to restrict abortion. (See the map from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute here.)

A few years back, movies like Juno and Knocked Up conveyed pro-life sentiments, if somewhat unintentionally. To see anything hinting at pro-life ideas coming out of Hollywood must have been particularly unsettling for a liberal pro-choice crowd that banks on media support for their social stances.

In polling, the numbers haven’t changed significantly in recent years, but a majority of Americans support significant restrictions on abortion, with roughly ⅔ wanting to limit it after the first trimester. Philosophically and ethically nonsensical as that first-trimester distinction may be, the polling results do show that Americans are not on board with the pro-choice vision for uninhibited free choice.

Add on top of it all the recent video exposés on Planned Parenthood’s sale of aborted baby body parts, and there’s good reason for pro-choicers to be concerned.

The next few years will be vital. If pop culture continues to advance a set of aggressively pro-choice assumptions, the younger generation may be led to believe that abortion indeed is common, practical, a necessary freedom, and, even routine. Culture is powerful, and the television dominates our modern sense of culture. Sadly, a hyper-pro-choice perspective is dominant among our entertainment creators, writers, and actors.

Pro-lifers must not content themselves with legal advances alone. They must push for cultural changes. The key conversation is both philosophical and emotional. Legal changes are (relatively) easily done and just as easily undone. Cultural shifts require time and diligent education.

First, people must be pushed on that philosophically-inconsistent polling response mentioned before: What makes a baby different in the first trimester? Is it a human or not? If so, how can you sanction the killing of human life? Who are you to decide for this unborn child that their life doesn’t “measure up” to the importance of your convenience? Particularly when adoption exists as a sound alternative.

Second, people must begin to realize the emotional pull of that young life. They must see the choice that is denied when a young baby is not allowed to live and make his or her own life choices. They must have empathy for the young baby needing care, support, and love.  They must recognize the potential and inherent beauty of this young life.

While the pro-life cause is making significant legal advances, the cultural question is very much still up in the air. The pro-choice contingent is making their play clear. It is extreme and aggressive. What a perfect time to push forward a loving, reasonable pro-life culture.

Zachary Gappa is Managing Editor at the John Jay Institute Center for a Just Society and Operations Manager at Gappa Security Solutions


  1. DCM7 says:

    “See the map from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute here.”
    Was there supposed to be a link there?

    • Bob Ellis says:

      Yes there was. It didn’t come through in the copy they sent me. I went to their website and pulled them. You can refresh the article and the embedded links will be there.

  2. DCM7 says:

    “Pro-choice advocates were once content to refer to abortion as an unfortunate necessity…. Now it’s presented as normal. Ordinary. Something to connect about with other women. Funny even.”

    This is typical of those who push causes like the “pro-choice” one. They have pretended, for PR purposes, to believe something — i.e., that abortion is an agonizing, last-resort choice that some women are forced to make — that they really didn’t believe. As the PR necessity for the pretense has faded, so has the pretense… and the true colors are displayed.

  3. Thisoldspouse says:

    I’ve found that there really is very little middle ground in the abortion debate, the “middle” normally entailing the “rape, incest and life/health of the mother” exception, which is really often just a thinly-veiled excuse to approve all abortion on demand. I have almost never come across another issue this polarized.

    How does one be “moderate” on abortion? Just a half-way abortion? This is one issue where the baby either dies or it lives. That’s why there is very little middle ground on it. I’m more likely to believe the staunch pro-lifer, whose arguments are much more sound, than the “exception-ist” who must work logical angles to justify the sometimes-abortion.