The Science of Homosexual Behavior

Plaque on the Pioneer 10 interstellar spacecraft, to show prospective alien contacts what humans look like

Given the success enjoyed by the homosexual agenda in the past 10 years, it’s amazing how little legitimacy and scientific support there is for the embrace of this behavior.

Many others and I have written numerous articles about many aspects of homosexual behavior which compel rational people to reject this as a practice that has any benefit or legitimacy.  The reasons to reject homosexual behavior include the moral positions of every major religion on earth, the unique and extremely important functional institution of marriage itself, the physical welfare of children, the multiple and extreme health risks associated with homosexual behavior, and the religious freedom threat posed by the acceptance of homosexual behavior that are just beginning to come to terms with.

One aspect of homosexual behavior which hasn’t seen a lot of examination is the physical science involved in homosexual behavior, and human sexuality in general.  As uncomfortable as it can be for decent people, it’s time to change that.

There can be no true sexual union between two men or two women. Think about it. We shouldn’t even have to discuss this sort of thing in polite society (it should be too simple to need discussing, and is of a special nature that it really shouldn’t be discussed this openly), but when radical Leftist declare war on normalcy and all that is good, sometimes we have to discuss delicate things…or capitulate and allow evil to to win in our silence.

In what meaningful way do the sex organs of two men or two women form a union? While it is physically possible to bring the sex organs of two women or two men into contact with each other, what level of union do they have? Forgive me for being graphic, but while you might be able to rub a vagina against a vagina, can two vaginas join? While you might be able to rub two penises together, can two penises join?

Alternatively, two women can engage in mutual masturbation, oral sex, or penetrate the vagina with a foreign object, but again, there is no union between the sex organs of two women. Also, two men can engage in mutual masturbation, oral sex, or can insert the penis of one into the anus of the other, but there is no union between the sex organs of two men.

An illustration of a counterfeit marriage, and a real marriage

Meanwhile, a man and a woman can easily complete a sexual union of their sex organs. If you are reading this, odds are you are an adult who is familiar with the design and function of the male and female sex organs first hand, or have at least been exposed to enough educational materials on human sexuality to be able to follow. The shape of the male and female sex organs make it obvious that they were intended to be utilized in concert together. The concave shape of the vagina is similar to the convex shape of the penis. The size of the male and female sex organs are also generally the same and complimentary in nature. In preparation for sexual union, the male penis becomes rigid so that it is able to enter a woman’s vagina, and a woman’s vagina opens up and becomes lubricated so that it is able to accommodate the penis in a fashion that is comfortable and pleasurable for both the male and the female. When the act of sex is completed between a man and a woman, reproduction often occurs; reproduction never, ever, ever occurs between two men or two women.

In the case of male homosexuals, where the anus is often the target of sexual gratification, science makes it obvious that the anus was designed to expel bacteria-laden feces, not to receive a penis for the purpose of sexual gratification.

Even after the reproductive process (the ultimate joining together of two people where genetic material from a male body joins genetic material from a female body and makes a completely unique third human being–a joining that two men or two women can never bring about) has been initiated, the differences between the male and female body make it clear that they were designed for complimentarianism in child rearing. The typical male body is bigger and more rugged than that of the typical female, enabling the male to defend and provide for his wife and children especially when they are at vulnerable stages in their lives. A woman’s body is designed to provide a protective environment for the initial stage of development of the child which resulted from their sexual union, and her body was designed and equipped to nurture the child until such time as the child becomes able to consume more solid forms of food.

A man and a woman can, together, provide the best environment possible for the healthy development of children. In addition to the aforementioned roles for which men and women are ideally constructed, a husband and wife can model for the child the healthy, balanced interaction and cooperation of males and females in a close, day-to-day environment. On the other hand, two men or two women running a household models a message to the child which says that one sex or the other is either undesirable or unnecessary, or both; this is not a healthy, balanced or productive message to send to an impressionable child. Men and women also have innate predispositions, talents and insights that not only make the home a more balanced and productive environment for everyone, these innate personality differences also provide greater balance and perspective for the growing child; a home with two men or two women is deliberately bereft of that same balance and perspective.

Since marriage is the union of two people (understood by every civilization throughout history as a union of a man and a woman), and since it is obvious from logic and science that there can be no meaningful union between two men or two women, it therefore follows scientifically that there can be no such real thing as “homosexual marriage,” any more than bringing two bolts or two nuts together forms anything useful or meaningful.

Homosexual behavior is anti-science in every way.

If you are a Darwinist (which I am not), this behavior is obviously anti-science because it can affect no reproduction or continuation of the species. It is contrary to evolution doctrine, and if Darwinism and homosexual apologists who claim homosexual behavior is biological in causation are to be believed, homosexual behavior should have evolved out of humanity many thousands of years ago, because it has no positive benefit toward the continuation of the species and it cannot be passed on to subsequent generations by engaging in the subject behavior.

In two decades or more of desperate searching, the holy grail “gay gene” has never been found, and even the most helpful subjective studies like those involving twins reveal far too few homosexual twin pairs to ever justify the belief that homosexual behavior is genetic.  Meanwhile, all the best clinical data points toward environmental influences as the driver of homosexual behavior.

Homosexual behavior is also anti-science in that its practitioners use their sex organs in a manner which is obviously contrary to their intended design and function.

Since there are numerous health hazards associated with homosexual behavior, it is obvious that behavior is contrary to the science of good health, which is in turn contrary to the best odds for the continuation of the species. Normal biological functions do not drastically elevate the disease rate of human beings; homosexual behavior does.

There will come a day when the practical will make clear what the reasoned and academic could not make clear to a reprobate generation, and homosexual behavior will once again be seen for what it is. When that time comes, and we must rebuild the moral fiber of our society and repair the damage done to the foundation of family, good people will need to understand these things and be able to articulate them to a lost society that is finally ready to accept reality and the answers that come with it.

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

• Fourteen Religious Traditions Agree: Marriage Between a Man and a Woman
• Jail Marriage Counterfeiters
• Thought Police Demand Homosexual Legitimization
• Homosexual Parenting is Harmful to Children
• Sweet Cakes Takes a Stand for Marriage

Bob Ellis has been the owner of media company Dakota Voice, LLC since 2005. He is a 10-year U.S. Air Force veteran, a political reporter and commentator for the past decade, and has been involved in numerous election and public policy campaigns for over 20 years. He was a founding member and board member of the Tea Party groups Citizens for Liberty and the South Dakota Tea Party Alliance. He lives in Rapid City, South Dakota with his wife and two children.

Bob Ellis

View all articles by Bob Ellis