ObamaCare Uninsured Enrollee Number Off by Millions

ObamaCareThe numbers are in for Obamacare sign-ups on the exchanges in accordance with the April 1 deadline to enroll: 7 million have enrolled.

But apparently, only about one-third were previously uninsured, reported the Los Angeles Times on March 30: “At least 6 million people have signed up for health coverage on the new marketplaces, about one-third of whom were previously uninsured.”

The Times estimate was drawn from “a review of state and federal enrollment reports, surveys and interviews with insurance executives and government officials nationwide.”

If the one-third previously uninsured gaining coverage figure holds up with the most recent sign-ups, that would mean only about 2.3 million of the 7 million did not have coverage last year.

Problem: In May 2013, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that 7 million previously uninsured individuals would sign up on the exchanges, not 2 million or so. That means they may have been off by as many as 4.7 million.

Although, by February 2014 — perhaps because of the botched rollout of Healthcare.gov and the exchanges — CBO had downgraded that estimate to about 6 million. Even then, CBO still appears to be way off.

Woodrow Wilcox


Because right now, the people most likely to use the exchanges to get new coverage are those who lost their coverage because of the law, not the uninsured Obama championed in his push to adopt the law.

We’ll know more soon. As Talking Points Memo noted, the 7 million “does not include the Monday sign-ups in the 14 states operating their own marketplaces. In addition, the enrollment deadline was relaxed for people having trouble completing the process, so some people could still sign up in the next two weeks.”



How many sign up is not inconsequential, they may very well determine the success or failure of Obamacare.

If more people sign up for health insurance than expected, then health premiums for everyone should be lower than anticipated. But insurance subsidies from the federal government would also be higher.

On the other hand, if enrollment goals fall far short of expectations, then premiums will be much higher, yet subsidies will be lower.

The reason premiums would rise under the lower-enrollment scenario is because Obamacare increases what minimally must be covered under individual and employer plans. The additional enrollees are supposed to offset the higher costs of plans. If they don’t show up, then all bets are off.

To make the books right, perhaps ultimately the Obama administration will just start auto-enrolling unwilling “customers” to meet its Soviet-style Gosplan projections.

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Robert Romano is the Senior Editor of Americans for Limited Government (ALG) News Bureau. Americans for Limited Government is a non- partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free market reforms,private property rights and core American liberties.
Robert Romano
View all posts by Robert Romano
Roberts website
  • thisoldspouse

    All federal government statistics are all lies in this day. There is NO motivation to tell the truth.

    • Not when the American people-even Republicans-won’t hold the liars accountable.

      What was that President George Washington said was an indispensable support of political prosperity for a nation?