ADF: SCOTUS Ruling Leaves Proposition 8 Intact

Alliance Defending Freedom’s Austin Nimocks
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court Wednesday declined to review the validity of Proposition 8, California’s constitutional amendment protecting marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
The court said that the official proponents of Proposition 8 do not have the legal authority to defend it in federal court, even though the state’s governor and attorney general refused to defend it. The high court then voided a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit opinion striking down the amendment. Without an appellate court decision declaring the amendment unconstitutional, Proposition 8 remains the law of the land in California.
“Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, the debate over marriage has only just begun,” said Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Austin R. Nimocks, a member of the Proposition 8 legal defense team. “The court’s decision does not silence the voices of Americans. Marriage–the union of husband and wife–will remain timeless, universal, and special, particularly because children need mothers and fathers. This has been the experience of diverse cultures and faiths throughout history, including the American experience, and that will not change.”
“Americans will continue advancing the truth about marriage between a man and a woman and why it matters for children, civil society, and limited government,” Nimocks added.
In a dissent from the majority opinion in Hollingsworth v. Perry, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, “The essence of democracy is that the right to make law rests in the people and flows to the government, not the other way around. Freedom resides first in the people without need of a grant from government.”
Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys are part of the legal team defending the California marriage amendment on behalf of ProtectMarriage.com, the banner organization for the official proponents and campaign committee of Proposition 8.
- Legal analysis of Supreme Court decision: Hollingsworth v. Perry
- The Supreme Court denied standing to ProtectMarriage.com. What is “standing”?
- Pronunciation guide: Nimocks (NIM’-ucks)
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
Similar Posts:
- Rule of Law Refused in California
- Is There Rule of Law in California?
- Prop 8 Defenders Will Appeal Judicial Activism from 9th Circuit
- Thomas More Society Expects SCOTUS to Uphold Proposition 8
- The Consequences of the Incoherent SCOTUS Marriage Decisions
Recent Comments