Corruption on Parade in the South Dakota House
The vote on the motion to amend HB 1220 (to insert a "suicide clause" into SB 38). The amendment failed in the "Republican" House 53-16.
ADVERTISEMENT
By Charles Poppen
Last year South Dakota accepted one million dollars to study the state acceptance of ObamaCare via Health Exchange. Of this amount, over $600,000 has been spent so far. Curiously, people like Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana refused the money and wrote a nice “Keep your money, we’re not going to do it” letter to Obama. This governor did not fall for the scam that is ObamaCare. This governor also showed backbone. We should take heart that there are still people in America like him.
During the last legislative session, our legislators in Pierre were told that they must pass Senate Bill 38 and Senate Bill 43 (aka embracing ObamaCare) to lay the groundwork for health exchanges or Washington would do it for us and we would have little or no control over our health exchanges. Our legislators were also told by representatives of the large health “systems” and the largest insurance companies that not passing SB 38 and SB 43 would put them in an impossible position. Both SB 38 and SB 43 passed.
ADVERTISEMENT
But when the same arguments were used in North Dakota, legislators thought something just didn’t smell right. They did not pass similar legislation. Because of the case made by special interests who think they will profit from ObamaCare a special session of the North Dakota Legislature was convened this past November. What legislators discovered was that ObamaCare did not contain any funding mechanism for the feds to start and run health exchanges at the state level.
In other words, it was a hollow threat. Additionally, it was discovered that despite claims of flexibility by the Federal HHS for states setting up their own health exchanges, there is little or no flexibility beyond the tight restrictions set out in the regulations. Okay, so how about big hospitals and big insurance companies being in an impossible position if ObamaCare was not embraced? They found that statement wasn’t true either. The special session passed no legislation with regards to ObamaCare. House majority Leader Al Carlson summed up: Implementing Health Care Exchanges would be “foolish” and “passing anything would send the wrong message to Washington.”
When I called North Dakota Insurance Commissioner’s Office it was relayed to me that they call Federal HHS at least weekly to stay up to date with any new developments. “After all this time HHS doesn’t even have any final rules or partnership plans for health exchanges” I was told.
ADVERTISEMENT
When legislators in South Dakota found they had passed SB 38 & SB 43 based on statements that were untrue they asked for a chance to vote on the bills again. House Bill 1165 and House Bill 1167 were introduced this session to repeal SB 38 & SB 43.
The bills were heard in the House State Affairs Committee first thing this past Monday morning. The reasons for the repealers were articulated quite well. It was only fair to let the bills move to the floor so other law makers could vote on the acceptance of ObamaCare based on FACTS. Defenders of ObamaCare gave the same reasons for protecting SB 38 and SB 43 as they gave for passing the bills in the first place. The reasons, of course, were no truer now than they were last year. Not one member of the committee questioned the accuracy of statements made by the opponents. Nor did one committee member ask why North Dakota, Louisiana and other states have said no thanks to the embrace of Obama Care. Don’t those states have hospitals and insurance companies too?
The committee actually rushed to kill the bills. Rep. Hal Wick was the only dissenting voice. Twelve members of the house prevented the rest of the legislature from addressing laws that were passed based on misinformation. And they did it knowingly. And for whose benefit? Not patients or doctors, that’s for sure. This action represents a level of corruption I’ve never seen in South Dakota in my lifetime. Will we hold these so called representatives accountable? Or will we just lumber down the road to socialism obediently without a whimper.
Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally posted on the Siouxland Republican Women website.
Charles Poppen is the producer of the documentary Rethinking Health Care
ADVERTISEMENT
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
Similar Posts:
- Hearing on Health Ins. Exchange Scheduled in SD House Cmte
- Action Alert: HB 1190 – Require Legislative Approval Before a Health Insurance Exchange is Created
- South Dakota Legislative Update, Feb. 22, 2012
- South Dakota Reverses Course on ObamaCare
- Questions About ObamaCare in South Dakota
Recent American Clarion Articles
SOS: Speaking of Seniors - Great News!
On May 31, 2016, I got some great news. The doctor who runs a major department at a hospital in northern Indiana phoned me with the good news. His department cancelled the contract with a medical billing firm in central Indiana that had been messing up bills for our
On the Issues: Tina Mulally
American Clarion recently submitted a list of questions to Tina Mulally, a fresh candidate for the South Dakota Senate in District 35. These questions focused primarily on bills that were considered in the 2016 legislative session, to develop an idea of how the candidate might have voted on these
The Puritans, Part 7
This bay to the south was the bay for Boston. If you were to bring up a map of the Boston area on the internet, you would see that there are two rivers which flow into the water way that leads to the bay. One is now called the Charles and the other is called the Mystic. The Mystic comes in from
LGBT Idolatry in the Pulpit
When we ask the question whose to blame for the mess in our county, the most often stated response is that it is politicians. And while they bear a great responsibility, it goes deeper than that. I believe President James Garfield’s had it right in his 1876 Speech on the 100th anniversary of the
Retired Naval Officer Will Talk about Soviet Era Spying and Surveillance
“The Cold War continues,” says retired US Navy Captain James A. Huff of Rapid City, an expert in naval intelligence who cut his teeth on Russian-American spying and surveillance activities spanning several continents near the end of the Soviet Era.
On the Issues: Stace Nelson
American Clarion recently submitted a list of questions to Stace Nelson, a fresh candidate for the South Dakota Senate in District 19. These questions focused primarily on bills that were considered in the 2016 legislative session, to develop an idea of how the candidate might have voted on these
Why Shouldn’t Parents Have School Choice?
A groundbreaking new study from the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas provides state of the art data showing the benefits of school choice. The bottom line: When parents have choice where to send their child to school, their children perform better in reading and math
Recent Comments