The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sun beam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power. — Alexander Hamilton

Racial divide has worsened under Obama

November 3, 2012   ·   By   ·   1 Comments

divisionThe headline of a recent article by The Washington Post’s Peter Wallsten capsulizes, inadvertently, the supreme paradox of Barack Obama’s presidency. “Obama struggles to balance African America’s hopes with country’s as a whole,” it says.

The story documents Obama’s struggles over the last four years, which continue today, to avoid overplaying his hand as the first black president, yet to also not ignore this fact.

But nowhere does Wallsten note the irony that four years ago many understood the meaning of Obama’s election as the beginning of the end of the perception of black America as a world apart from the rest of America.

There was exhilaration that the nightmare was over — finally. That wrongs have been righted, that we can get on with America’s business without the ongoing issue of race looming, and that we can stop looking at blacks politically as a special class of Americans.

Yet here we are now, at the end of the term of this first black president, and attitudes about race seem to have hardly changed at all. There is still the sense that black America and the rest of America are not on the same page and that blacks and the country as a whole have different needs and different agendas.

Wasn’t Obama’s election supposed to have changed all of this?

Not only have racial tensions not improved, but the racial divide also appears to have widened.

“Win or lose,” Wallsten continues, “the electorate that decides his fate Nov. 6 will be far more racially divided than the one that propelled him into the history books.”

According to a Gallup poll done last year, the third year of the Obama presidency, the election of a black man as president had little impact on the enormous difference in perceptions of blacks and whites on the need for government activism.

Fifty-nine percent of blacks, compared to 19 percent of whites, said government should play a “major role” in trying to improve the social and economic position of blacks and other minority groups in this nation.

Fifty-two percent of blacks, compared to 15 percent of whites, said new laws were needed to reduce discrimination against blacks.

If Obama’s election has had little or no impact on improving racial politics or changing the sense that blacks must be viewed as a special political class, what exactly, practically, has it meant?

Rather than making things better, it has really made matters worse.

From the perspective of Democrat-voting blacks, the implication of a black president was not a more racially just America. It was about assuming there would be a man in the White House more prepared to sign off on special political treatment for blacks. To the extent this has not happened, there has been dissatisfaction.

From the perspective of conservatives, tensions have increased because criticism of Obama’s big-government liberalism has been spun as racially motivated.

The Obama presidency has not ushered in a new era of racial tranquility because, despite all the hype, it’s not what it has been about.

The real tension in America today is not about black versus white but about liberalism versus conservatism.

Liberalism is about government as a political agent, not as a protector of individual freedom. By its very nature, liberalism creates political classes, whether based on race or gender or business interests. Those that get the goodies are happy. Those that pay for them are not. Tensions and animosities get worse, not better.

In the end, we all suffer because giving politicians more power means less growth and prosperity.

Things will never get solved until we finally take “e pluribus unum” seriously. That American diversity can only be finally united through one set of values, under God, that enables freedom. One set of true values for all.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Star Parker is president of the Coalition on Urban Renewal & Education and author of the new book White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay. Prior to her involvement in social activism, Star Parker was a single welfare mother in Los Angeles, California. After receiving Christ, Star returned to college, received a BS degree in marketing and launched an urban Christian magazine.
Star Parker
View all articles by Star Parker
Print Friendly
Clip to Evernote

How Republicans 'Fight'

   From Americans for Limited Government

Featured Articles

Rep. Lora Hubbel

Lora Hubbel Announces Run for South Dakota Governor

Bob Ellis

I was not able to be at former South Dakota Rep. Lora Hubbel's announcement in Rapid City yesterday of her run for governor in 2014, but the Rapid City Journal and other media outlets covered it. Among the reasons Hubbel mentioned for running are several areas where Gov. Daugaard has betrayed Republican values, including his facilitation of ObamaCare in South Dakota.


The Politics of Unbelief: Who Will Hear?

David Pepe

What is REAL and REALITY today in American politics? Well... that a good question, but in all honesty who will really hear ETERNAL REALITY?? The common denominator however across the American political spectrum is the rejection of Almighty God's Heavenly summons to repent and to be saved. Will the Left hear Almighty God's Heavenly summons? NO... not at all. Will the Moderates hear?? No... they will not! They are confusion themselves. Will the conservatives hear? Tragically, the majority of them will not.


CitizenLink Report on Common Core

Bob Ellis

CitizenLink provides this report on Common Core educational standards, and some of the reasons why many people are concerned about them. These reasons include the fact that they were developed nationally and not locally, the lack of parental and local involvement in the standards, their heavy-handed implementation, dumbing-down of the standards, etc.

Ku Klux Klansmen and women at a cross lighting in on November 12th, 2005. (Source: WIkimedia Commons)

The Historical Party of Racism Calls Tea Party ‘Racist’

Bob Ellis

I guess when you're morally and intellectually bankrupt, the only retort you can muster is the tired old lie of smearing your opponents as "racists." At some point (long past), the lies of the Left really start to make George Orwell's novels look like non-fiction. Can someone get Rep. Grayson a history book...or two?


Turn Out the Lights, the Party’s Over

Jim Bowman

Today, after a very long four plus, almost five years, we have another turn key of the lights. While he busies himself with usual excuse making and alibis, per his insulting style of “talking down to,” there is a growing mindset that enough is enough, as each successive TV appeal becomes more and more routine. The sense and growing reaction from both supporters and detractors is that what former oratory skills Obama no doubt possessed has now become stale and increasingly insulting.


"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964