History will also afford the frequent opportunities of showing the necessity of a public religion, from its usefulness to the public; the advantage of a religious character among private persons; the mischiefs of superstition, and the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern. — Benjamin Franklin, Proposals Relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1749), p. 22.

What Will Conservatives Do if Obama Wins?

October 5, 2012   ·   By   ·   1 Comments


“You look out for yourselves.  I release you of your duties.”—Captain Edward Smith of the Titanic, to his crew, April 15, 1912

What will conservatives and libertarians do once persuasion has proven futile and the electoral process has been exhausted?  What if President Obama wins re-election?

Of course, nothing here should imply that a Romney win will assure freedom’s resurgence.  Debt, dependency and decline represent not a disease but symptoms of a cancerous malaise that has seen global power and relevance shift from the West to Asia.

But an Obama win would surely seal the perception, by way of tacit voter approval, that America no longer aspires to be Reagan’s city on a hill.  We want to be France, with their free health care and guaranteed vacations.  A second term could allow Obama to reshape, with but one appointment, the ideological balance of the Supreme Court.  And, depending on congressional control, he could further immobilize the coal industry and push again for cap-and-trade.

But the question at hand is what are conservatives and libertarians going to do?  Is it time to throw in the towel?  Social conservative Paul Weyrich opined in 1999 that the culture was lost.  Losing the culture, of course, is but a precursor.

Does the age of Obama permanently relegate conservatives and libertarians to outcast status in their own country?

Possibly.  No one can foretell the future, and noted strategist and Fox News contributor Dick Morris recently remarked that, after a second Obama term, no Democrat will win the presidency for a long time.  But until then, most conservatives are too staid for outright rebellion.

Libertarians seem a little more open to tweaking the establishment, infamous for protesting income taxes and, while not advocating law-breaking, advising citizens on how to drop out of the system.  But both prefer example and persuasion to upheaval, indoctrination and smashing Starbuck’s windows, and few see politics as a primary vehicle for social betterment, opting for faith and family — in short, they’re too busy living life to riot in the streets.

So, barring martial law, few on the right will ever condone outright rebellion.  But do their better natures rule out an underground economy, particularly to avoid the dictates of Obama-care?

Expect even larger sums of capital to leave the U.S. for overseas tax havens and freer economies.  According to the Heritage Foundation, the U.S. ranks 10th in economic freedom, with Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia heading the list.  FreeEnterprise.com actually ranks the U.S. at 18.  Even Ireland and Switzerland rank higher than America, and capital will inevitably flow to where it is rewarded.  For those of us not likely to make millions overseas, there remain pockets of freedom in the West, such as Costa Rica and some Caribbean islands, for example.

But to the average freedom-loving American, this is our home and we will fight to the death to preserve its defining virtues.  Heated rebellion, let alone secession or civil unrest, is highly unlikely.  Some will give up on America, looking out just for themselves, intent only on leaving an untaxed legacy for their children.  Yet, giving up is not part of the American character.  It is certainly not a tenet of conservative or libertarian thought.

Back to the Titanic, to which America’s foundering economy is frequently compared.  Captain Smith did (reportedly) free the crewmen from their duties, but added, “Do your best for the women and children.”  Indeed, acts of selflessness and service played out even after the Titanic had sunk beneath the waves.

This is perhaps a dire illustration to heal wounds after a mere election loss.  But conservatives and libertarians will not idly watch their fellow citizens drown under debt and statism.  Our better natures will not allow it, however tempting the call of self-preservation or public anger.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

David Bozeman, former Libertarian Party Chairman, is a Liberty Features Syndicated writer.
David Bozeman
View all articles by David Bozeman
Davids website
Clip to Evernote
  • jdelaney3

    I am of another view. I sincerely believe many millions of patriots will link up with each other in an organized nationwide attempt to effectively put the brakes on the socialist transformation and economic collapse threatening our country, our communities, our families. Great pressure will be brought to bear on Congress to impeach and remove Obama. Of that, I couldn’t be more certain. To press the point, massive marches on DC will ensue. They will be peaceful-unless attacked-but they will be relentless and loud. They will not countenance being ignored or otherwise dismissed by the Statists in DC.
    The pushback will most certainly entail widespread civil disobedience, organized appeals for nullification at the state level, and, yes, secession.
    It is more than abundantly obvious that DC no longer represents American values, traditions, constitutionalism. In a second Obama regime even less so. For that matter, most states, already corrupted by an overweaning central gov’t, who, for the most part, are in lockstop with the Statists in DC, will be seriously pressed to nullify, even secede.
    Grassroots leaders, grounded in the Constitution and the rule of law, will quickly develop leading to an effective multifaceted campaign against the Statists and their “law of rule” at every level of gov’t.
    In short, conservatives, libertarians & patriots everywhere will not go quietly into the night and will most certainly not be led like lambs into the slaughter house.

Featured Articles


All About Marriage: A Defender’s Toolkit

Bob Ellis

Ryan T. Anderson has a great series of articles about marriage at Ricochet, released in conjunction with his new book, co-authored with Sherif Girgis and Robert P. George, What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. Anderson discusses why marriage matters, what marriage is, and why government has a role in protecting marriage from being undermined or counterfeited.


Fairness Doctrine…for License Plates?!

Gina Miller

Last Friday, an 84-year-old President Reagan appointee, North Carolina Federal Judge James C. Fox, issued a ruling declaring the state’s “Choose Life” license plates to be an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment, giving the ACLU its desired victory against the message, “Please don’t choose to kill your pre-born baby.”


O Little Town of Bethlehem

William J. Federer

Phillips Brooks was born DECEMBER 13, 1835. The bishop of the Episcopal Church in Massachusetts, Phillips Brooks took a trip to the Holy Land in 1865, and wrote home: "After an early dinner, we took our horses and rode to Bethlehem...Before dark, we rode out of town to the field where they say the shepherds saw the star. It is a fenced piece of ground with a cave in it (all the Holy Places are caves here), in which, strangely enough, they put the shepherds..."


Does the Constitution Allow ‘Mandatory Spending’?

Bill Wilson

In 2013, $2.2 trillion of the $3.65 trillion budget will be on so-called “mandatory” spending — a Washingtonian euphemism for automatic spending. It just operates on autopilot, and even increases of its own accord as a function of the rising population that qualifies for benefits and built-in cost-of-living adjustments. But is such a design constitutional?


Govt Union Officials Net $138K Each From Taxpayers


Taxpayers are footing the bill for thirty five union officials at the U.S. Department of Transportation, which spent $4.8 million dollars in union salaries in 2012, paying an average salary of $138,175 per year according to a report released by Americans for Limited Government today.


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964