No government can flourish without religion. — Thomas Jefferson

Infertility and Selective Abortion: Steering a Course Between Scylla and Charybdis

October 2, 2012   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

Italian fresco of Odysseus's boat passing between the six-headed monster Scylia and the whirlpool Charybdis.

Italian fresco of Odysseus’s boat passing between the six-headed monster Scylia and the whirlpool Charybdis.

A lot of people, conservatives in particular, tend to idealize the past.  We like to wax lyrical about simpler times, the “good old days.”  Of course, if we are honest we have to admit that those good old days weren’t always so great.

The passage of time and progress of society have brought many blessings – civil, cultural, and technological.  Society today is freer, fairer, safer, and more comfortable.

Unfortunately many of the blessings of progress come at a cost.  The same technologies that make life healthier and more comfortable can also present us with previously unimagined ethical dilemmas.  This principle was illustrated recently in an open letter published in Slate magazine’s “Dear Prudence” feature.  “Prudence” dispenses “advice on manners and morals” to those struggling to navigate the complexities of life in the 21st century.

This particular edition featured a letter from a woman who became pregnant with quintuplets after being treated for infertility.  Fearful of total miscarriage or severe disability of one or more babies, she opted for “selective reduction” and gave birth to twins.  The intention of the woman and her husband had always been to keep this decision a secret from the surviving twins, but her father has been threatening to tell his grandchildren because he believes that family secrets are harmful and wrong.  What should she do?  In rendering her advice, Prudie assures her that she made a “painful, but medically sound choice.”

This situation illustrates a unique kind of ethical dilemma made possible by the amazing progress of medical technology over the past several decades.  Unwilling to accept the fact of her infertility, this woman and her husband turned to technology to create life where none previously existed.  Unfortunately, this solution delivered up more than they bargained for, and they made the decision to kill three children in order to improve the prognosis for two.  A couple with no children became parents of five thanks to the miracle of modern science, but then they chose to correct this technological “glitch” by aborting three of their babies to arrive at a more manageable figure.

Prudence reassures this woman that her decision was medically sound, but would she also maintain that it was ethically sound?  Because the “odds” are that one or more of her quintuplets would have been disabled, did that warrant the destruction of three human lives?  Are the lives of two developmentally normal children worth more than the lives of five disabled children?  Does the mere “chance” of disability warrant the destruction of an unborn child?  In many European countries the answer to this question appears increasingly to be “yes.”  Thanks to prenatal testing that predicts the odds of chromosomal abnormalities, Downs Syndrome and other developmental disabilities are all but extinct because women are aborting their babies rather to avoid facing the possibility of having a child with special needs.

It seems monstrous to put any parent in the position of having to choose which of their children live and which die.  Yet this kind of scenario is increasingly common due to the increase in reliance upon fertility technology and the multiple pregnancies that often result.  Is it ethical to create a situation where a mother is inevitably going to be faced with a prenatal version of Sophie’s Choice?  Didn’t we all hate the Nazi who visited that decision on Sophie?

Technology brings us many blessings, but it is fraught with danger as well.  Sadly, many who seek to avail themselves of the benefits of technology fail to look down the road and contemplate the dangers associated with its use.  Fertility technology has become so commonplace that few question its ethical implications.  But if we are indeed an ethical and compassionate society, we must ask whether it is a good thing for mankind to play God with respect to the creation and destruction of human life.  What equips us to make such decisions?  Are we all-knowing, perfectly just, and perfectly loving?  Can we always be sure that we’re doing the right thing, making the right choices?  Are we prepared to bear responsibility for the consequences of these choices?  And what about the three who were sacrificed so that their siblings would have a better chance of life without disability?  Did they have a choice in the decision?  Shouldn’t they?  Didn’t they have a huge stake in the outcome of the decisions being made?

Because this family chose to “play God” with respect to the creation and destruction of human life, five lives were created, but only two survived.  Now, years later the impact of that decision may affect the emotional health of their surviving children and is driving a wedge of mistrust and resentment between father and daughter.  Let this be a cautionary tale for a society that takes its technology for granted.  Before we elect to steer a course between Scylla and Charybdis, we should think long and hard about the consequences and collateral damage of our decisions.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Attorney Ken Connor is the Chairman of the Center for a Just Society in Washington, DC, and the former President of the Family Research Council. He served as counsel to Governor Jeb Bush in Bush v. Schiavo during the Terri Schiavo case, and is co-author of "Sinful Silence: When Christians Neglect Their Civic Duty."
Ken Connor
View all articles by Ken Connor
Kens website
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

Featured Articles


What Will Conservatives Do if Obama Wins?

David Bozeman

What will conservatives and libertarians do once persuasion has proven futile and the electoral process has been exhausted? What if President Obama wins re-election? Of course, nothing here should imply that a Romney win will assure freedom’s resurgence. But an Obama win would surely seal the perception, by way of tacit voter approval, that America no longer aspires to be Reagan’s city on a hill. We want to be France, with their free health care and guaranteed vacations.


Perspective on Obama’s Gargantuan $5.3 Trillion Debt

Rick Manning

The 2012 fiscal year ended this past weekend with a whimper, as our nation suffered approximately $1.2 trillion of new debt this year, bringing the total to $5.3 trillion since Barack Obama became president. $5.3 trillion is a lot of money. It is more than any other president has increased the national debt in history. In fact, $5.3 trillion constitutes about one-third of the entire national debt of the United States.


Record 1,500 Pastors to Stand for Freedom This Weekend


Nearly 1,500 pastors in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have registered to participate in Alliance Defending Freedom’s fifth annual Pulpit Freedom Sunday. In just the last week, registration rose from a record 1,050 to 1,477 and continues to grow as registration stays open through the date of the event, this Sunday.


Obama’s Job-and Credibility-Gap

Bill Wilson

In this recession, the economy has lost a net 3.4 million jobs from its 2008 peak that have not yet been recovered. Meanwhile the working age population has grown by more than 11.1 million since then — creating a 13.5 million and widening jobs gap that will not be filled easily no matter who wins the election on Nov. 6.

Religious freedom

Counterfeit Marriage Undermines Religious Freedom

Bob Ellis

Leftist social engineers try to make us believe that acquiescence to the homosexual agenda in no way affects those who recognize that homosexual behavior is immoral, unhealthy and aberrant. As if common sense wasn't enough, a quick look around the world at places that have submitted to the homosexual agenda reveals this as a complete lie.


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

Authors (with latest article)

  • Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

NewMedia blog