In the supposed state of nature, all men are equally bound by the laws of nature, or to speak more properly, the laws of the Creator. — Samuel Adams, letter to the Legislature of Massachusetts, 17 January 1794

The Media as Obama’s ATM

August 21, 2012   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

ATMRecently, NBC News came out with a breathless headline announcing the shocking news that, “Top CEOs donate to Romney over Obama by 4-1 margin.”

This “news” that the men and women who run our nation’s largest companies favor the pro-growth policies favored by Romney over the tax and regulatory strangulation that Obama supports and has enacted into law is about as dog bites man as it can get.

In response to this “story”, Americans for Limited Government decided to examine the political giving of NBC corporate executives.  Of course, NBC, the parent company of MSNBC, lost all pretense of objectivity years ago, but the giving patterns in the Obama/Romney race are stark.

NBC/Universal’s top brass has given $111,975 to Obama to date, while only $8,500 has been given to the Romney campaign — a 13 to 1 Obama advantage.

When you take away contributions from the NBC Board of Directors, Governor Romney has only received $1,000 from senior NBC/Universal executives with Obama receiving the same $111,975.

Ironically, Obama Job Council Chairman and General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt sits on the NBC/Universal Board of Directors, and while sitting out the presidential campaign to date, has actually given slightly more money to Republican candidates than Democrat ones.

However, the real question that any thinking person has to ask when looking at the Federal Election Commission data is how can NBC continue any kind of charade of even handedly covering the presidential election, when the company’s decision makers are in lock-step behind one candidate?

While a media affirmative action program to attract conservative voices into leadership at media company’s like NBC/Universal is contrary to basic free market principles, it would seem like a wise idea for a major media company to at least attempt to have some semblance of philosophical diversity within its own ranks.

NBC’s slavish devotion to the Obama candidacy from the top down cannot help but cause them to alienate themselves from the very viewers whom they seek to attract.  In fact, when the evening news only has 22 minutes and two or three “election” stories a night, it brings into question whether there is any internal break at all to the never-ending spouting of the Obama line.  This bias could have little to do with intent, but instead could be the result of a gigantic blind spot directly related to the lack of ideological diversity.

Three years ago, the Washington Post discovered that they were not even aware that Obama green czar Van Jones was in political trouble, before he ended up leaving the Administration shrouded by controversy.

Vowing to correct this embarrassing failure to even know what was going on, they hired a blogger to monitor and participate in the conservative blogosphere.  Later it was found that the Washington Post blogger was involved in a far left information sharing list serve that tarnished his legitimacy in conservative circles.  However, at least they were monitoring the opposition for news stories.

Unfortunately, this episode revealed that the Post was more interested in infiltrating the right, rather than creating diversity in their own news room. The exact kind of philosophical diversity needed to create the kind of knowledge, sources and reporting that would lead to more trustworthy reporting.

Now, NBC faces the same challenge.  Will they decide that going for the far left niche in a center/right country makes sense, or will they seek a return to relevance by opening up their news room to those who don’t agree with their current group think.

The good business decision is to seek the middle through political diversity of thought.  It will be interesting to see if NBC/Universal chooses the path which benefits their shareholders, or if they cling to the monolithic liberal thought that is revealed in their FEC giving reports.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Rick Manning is the Communications Director of Americans for Limited Government and the former Public Affairs Chief of Staff for the U.S. Department of Labor. Americans for Limited Governmentis dedicated to putting the principles of limited government into action. They work with local groups across the nation to promote freedom, limited government, and the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to harness the power of American citizens and grassroots groups in order to put the people back in charge in states across the country.
Rick Manning
View all articles by Rick Manning
Ricks website
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

Featured Articles


A Truly Compassionate Federal Budget

Rick Manning

$2.6 trillion dollars! In the entire history of our nation, the federal government has never taken in more money than that in revenues in a single year. 2008 was the last year, this revenue amount was achieved. $3.6 trillion dollars! That’s how much money our federal government spent last year, and it is how much it is projected to spend this year. $15.9 trillion! That is our nation’s current national debt. Some want to pretend this problem away and call those who support returning our federal budget spending to Fiscal Year 2007 levels mean spirited.


Presidential Pay to Play Green Grants

Rebekah Rast

A flood of criticism and questions surround the president’s energy agenda. Unfortunately for him, it seems his “green” energy ventures reek of biased decision making, thereby rightfully calling his agenda into question. Forbes states that 71 percent of Department of Energy grants went to “projects involving his [President Obama] major money bundlers, members of his National Finance Committee, or those who contributed as large Democratic Party donors.” Coincidence or intentional?

From the Declaration of Independence, at the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: Billy Hathorn)

God-Given Rights, Man-Made Anti-Rights, and Why ‘Safety Nets’ are Immoral

Publius Huldah

It is the dogma of our time that proponents of government safety net programs hold the moral high ground. Accordingly, Democrats preen over their own “compassion”; and Republicans chime in that they too “believe in safety net programs”. But safety net programs are unconstitutional and immoral. They are unconstitutional because “charity” is not one of the enumerated powers of the federal government. They are immoral because they are based on a fabricated system of man-made anti-rights which negate the Rights God gave us.


The False Promises of Annuities and Annuity Calculators

David John Marotta

An annuity is a financial product sold as a way to collect and grow funds and then later receive those funds as a steady cash flow during retirement. Annuities have many flavors and features that vary this basic principle, but the basic terms you will hear are "deferred or immediate" and "fixed or variable." Ever-popular annuities sometimes sound too good to be true, which in itself is probably a good reason to avoid them.

An example of simulated data modeled for the CMS particle detector on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. Here, following a collision of two protons, a Higgs boson is produced which decays into two jets of hadrons and two electrons. (Credit: Lucas Taylor)

The God Particle: I Don’t Think So

Dr. Robert R. Owens

Our super-smart, highly educated and well financed scientists tell us they don’t operate on faith; instead they operate on logic and objective evidence. Yet when you examine their chain of thought and peer into their evidence, it is a fabric of conjectures based upon one leap of faith after another. They have convinced themselves the air castles they have constructed are more than science fiction, but why should we believe them?


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

Authors (with latest article)

  • Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

NewMedia blog