The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. — James Madison, speech in the Virginia constitutional convention, December 2, 1829

Taxing Online Prosperity

August 21, 2012   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

e-commerceAcross America politicians of both parties will tell you the number one issue facing our country is job creation. They’re right — yet what they continually refuse to acknowledge is that creating these jobs is not their responsibility.

Government’s role in economic development should always be passive — confining expenditures to core functions while keeping taxes low in an effort to allow the optimum conditions for private sector growth.

“Get out of the way,” in other words.

Unfortunately our elected officials continue standing in the way of prosperity — as evidenced by the looming battle over internet taxation.  The U.S. Congress is currently contemplating legislation that would dramatically expand the ability of state and municipal governments to tax internet purchases across territorial lines.  In addition to being of dubious constitutionality (i.e. taxation without representation) this legislation would strike at the heart of the private sector in an effort to help state and local governments subsidize our nation’s growing dependence economy.

It’s a road this country has been down before.

“Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it,” former president Ronald Reagan once famously remarked.

That’s exactly what’s happening with internet commerce.  While the broader U.S. economy continues to groan under the weight of President Barack Obama’s failed Keynesian interventionism, internet commerce is one of the few segments of the private sector that’s “moving” – which makes it an inviting target for these state and local bureaucracies.

According to data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, online sales in America grew from $27.6 billion in 2000 (roughly 1 percent of all retail purchases) to $166.5 billion in 2010 (4.28 percent of all retail purchases).  And while total spending cooled during the recent recession, e-Commerce has expanded by double-digit percentages on a year-to-year basis over the lastseven consecutive quarters.

In fact based on data from industry analyst comScore, the rate of online spending growth during the second quarter of 2012 was four times as fast as the growth in overall consumer spending — with double-digit growth rates projected for the next four years.

Statistics like these make bureaucrats’ mouths water — which is why they are pushing Congress to grant them this expanded taxing power.  Under the so-called “Marketplace Fairness Act,” states and municipalities would be permitted to impose internet sales tax extraterritorially – forcing residents who live outside their borders to pay their local sales tax rates.  Meanwhile retailers that do more than $500,000 a year in gross receipts would be forced to calculate, collect and remit sales tax on all remote transactions — keeping track of 9,646 different sales tax jurisdictions.

Does that sound fair?  Of course not.  In fact this legislation would be a death knell for many of the small businesses that politicians claim to be fighting for — not to mention a harbinger of higher consumer prices as these businesses go by the wayside.

“Many of the smallest mom-and-pop operators would struggle to comply,” writes researcher Adam Thierer of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. “Greater industry consolidation and less competition and consumer choice could be the unfortunate result.”

And for what – so that state and local governments can continue a spending orgy that barely blinked during the recent recession?

“Politicians want this bill passed to raise new tax revenue for broken state governments facing budget shortfalls,” U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint explained recently.  “But legislators in state capitals don’t want to make the hard decisions to cut spending or raise taxes on their constituents — they fear the voter backlash. So they’d like their allies in Washington to make it legal for them to tax people who can’t vote against them.”

How big a dent in the economy are we talking about?  According to Forrester Research, the average American shopper spends around $1,700 annually online — which means they would pay an additional $125 annually.  Add it all up and we’re looking at a $23 billion tax hike — and that’s before we start assessing compliance costs and the damage done by thousands of lost jobs.

Is the American economy really in any condition to sustain such a blow?  No.  Tax hikes like this are part of the recipe for recessions, not recoveries.

Internet commerce will follow one of two paths moving forward: It will either continue to grow, driving a rebirth of American consumerism — or it will become yet another vibrant marketplace dragged down by the tentacles of big government.

If our elected officials are serious about “creating jobs,” then this choice is a no-brainer — and best of all it requires them to do absolutely nothing.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Howard Rich is the chairman of Americans for Limited Government. Americans for Limited Government is dedicated to putting the principles of limited government into action. They work with local groups across the nation to promote freedom, limited government, and the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to harness the power of American citizens and grassroots groups in order to put the people back in charge in states across the country.
Howard Rich
View all articles by Howard Rich
Howards website
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

Readers Comments (0)

Sorry, comments are closed on this post.

Featured Articles

Homeland Security flag (Photo credit: Bill Koplitz)

Unelected Muslims Dictate US Training Policy on Islam

Gina Miller

Do the anti-Americans in the current communist Democrat administration in Washington honestly believe that by eradicating anything “offensive” to Muslims from our national policies and institutions that Muslims will suddenly start “liking” us? Or is it more likely that the goons in the Obama regime are fully on-board with the Muslim goal of silencing any criticism of Islam?


Our Constitution was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People

William J. Federer

On OCTOBER 11, 1798, President John Adams wrote to the 1st Brigade, 3rd Division of Massachusetts' Militia: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."


Convicted Murderer’s Execution Challenge Dismissed


South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announced today that Judge Lawrence L. Piersol dismissed a constitutional challenge to South Dakota’s method of execution brought by death row inmate Donald Moeller. Judge Piersol’s ruling follows a hearing on October 4, 2012, during which Moeller told the court “I want to pay what I owe. I believe the death penalty is just in this case.”


Big Bird: A Symbol of the 2012 Election

Rick Manning

Perhaps those who believe that Big Bird, Elmo, Kermit and Miss Piggy need a taxpayer subsidy to help with early childhood education missed the “Tickle me Elmo” craze that generated millions of dollars, and they undoubtedly were unaware that Kermit and Miss Piggy went Hollywood a long time ago making millions in the process. Or, perhaps they haven’t flipped around to the hundreds of channels on their televisions and envisioned the bidding war to bring Big Bird to a privately funded station. As strange as it might seem, Big Bird just might be the perfect symbol for this election.


Should Government Ration Health Care?

Ken Connor

This year the U.S. is expected to spend $2.8 trillion on health care. The tab for Medicare alone will likely cost taxpayers $590 billion, with 25% of that sum going for patients in their last year of life. Given the anemic state of our economy and the huge strain on our medical resources, should government step in and decide how care is to be allocated among the sick and dying? Should Big Brother determine whose life is worth saving and whose is not by rationing health care?


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

Authors (with latest article)

  • Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

NewMedia blog