He who convinces you that getting angry at evil is wrong or undesirable, has already conquered you without firing a shot. — Unknown

Paul Ryanomics

August 20, 2012   ·   By   ·   0 Comments

Paul Ryan

Paul Ryan

Mitt Romney’s recent announcement of Paul Ryan as his running mate makes this election even more about government spending, programs and taxes. Ryan is the primary author of the Republican-led House’s 2013 budget proposal. Consider these five proposals to evaluate Romney’s wisdom in selecting him.

Ryan would limit Medicare costs in two ways. First, he would allow private insurance to compete with traditional Medicare. Plans would have to be at least as good as Medicare, and premium support would be fixed at the second least expensive plan offered. Second, if competition did not control costs, per capita increases would be capped at 0.5% above total economic growth. This safety net would ensure that overly generous entitlements do not overburden theU.S. economy.

Ryan advocates a simpler tax code. Any changes in the tax code mean there will be “winners” and “losers.” But the tax code is not static. Every change, no matter how small, also means a large number of people will behave differently. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is legally not permitted to consider these behavioral changes when it estimates how budget changes will impact revenue. Thus figures from the CBO are as useless as ignoring the principles of supply and demand.

For example, if you asked the CBO, “How much revenue would you collect if the tax rate were set to 100%?” they would have to answer, “You would collect the entire $15 trillion gross domestic product (GDP).” They are not allowed to take into account that none of us would work if the government took all our money. Similarly, they are not permitted to compute how much more productivity would be generated if tax rates were lowered.

The top U.S.corporate tax rate is currently 35%, scheduled to rise to 39.5% in 2013. This is now the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. The average rate is only 23%.

The average effective rate for corporations is lower, about 27.7%. Some corporations don’t have high profits and therefore do not pay a high tax rate. By the time corporations reach the 25% marginal rate, they have paid significant taxes in the lower tax brackets, making their effective average much lower. Corporations in some industries have sections of the tax code written specifically for them, translating into tax breaks that lower their burden.

Here is where understanding economics can help. Companies do not make decisions based on their effective tax rate. All decisions are made at the margin based on the top marginal tax rate. I wish voters understood that all decisions are made at the margin.

Imagine two identical companies in different countries that both have an effective tax rate of 25%. But theU.S.company is subject to a highly progressive tax code and its marginal rate is 35%, whereas the other company is subject to a flatter tax code and its rate is 25% no matter how much or little it makes. The foreign company has much more of an incentive for greater productivity.

To make the example even clearer, imagine there were only two tax rates, 10% and 100%. Once a company reached the edge of the 100% rate, it would stop bothering to earn any additional money. The top marginal rate would be 100%, but the effective tax rate would only be 10%. Changing the tax rate to a flat 20% might very well collect twice as much revenue, even though liberals would be blasting the plan as giving an 80% tax cut to the rich.

The fact that many companies pay a much lower effective rate is evidence of just how much the top marginal rate is keeping them from earning well into that rate. A flatter and lower tax that begins earlier would stimulate economic activity without necessarily changing tax revenues.

Ryan proposes just two rates: 10% and 25%. He would eliminate many of the tax loopholes that allow some companies to pay a lower rate.

The odd truth about corporate taxes is that while the rates have become more burdensome to those caught in the highest marginal rates, the taxes collected from corporations has been shrinking as a percentage of GDP.

Sound economics suggests that because decisions are made at the margin, the more corporations find themselves in a high marginal tax bracket, the lower the taxes that are collected. Flattening the tax and equalizing it among corporations by eliminating tax breaks and lowering the number of brackets might therefore have the opposite effect and increase tax revenue.

Ryan would regulate social programs. The states administer federally funded programs such as Medicaid and food stamps. They have an economic incentive to add people to these programs but little or no ability to reduce their costs. Conservatives support the types of incentives that produce self-regulating systems. Systems without this type of negative feedback ultimately explode in costs and numbers.

Ryan’s solution is to cap federal spending to the states with block grants and allow states to tailor the enrollment criteria. This would permit states to require work or job training and thus help move people off welfare. Fewer people in need means the states could provide greater support with the same amount of money. With one in seven Americans receiving food stamps, the current system is exploding.

When I was studying engineering, I wired a circuit board incorrectly, and a small mushroom cloud of smoke rose from one of the components. Any system that lacks negative feedback to regulate it ultimately explodes. But systems with too much negative feedback won’t perform at all. Conservatives claim the free market is overregulated and social entitlements are underregulated. From a systems point of view, I would have to agree.

Ryan would limit government spending as a percentage of the GDP. This is the right approach. Revenue has remained between 15% and 20% for years. Limiting spending to this range would ensure that spending doesn’t overtake our ability to tax. The austerity it will take us to get there, however, will involve some political work.

Ryan may risk a value-added tax. Both Ryan and Romney are open to such a tax. I have always feared the country would add a sales tax without solving any of its spending problems. In that case we will continue to sink into a European-style of malaise where growth continues to slow to the point it starts contracting.

Ryan will compromise politically. Ryan is savvy about what is possible in Washington. In the past he has voted for programs that were not in line with conservative values. If you are worried he is too conservative, this record should reassure you. If you believe the country’s situation calls for extreme measures, you may have doubts about what Ryan will actually be able to accomplish.

And this is probably Mitt Romney’s purpose in selecting him. Ryan agrees with the principles of smaller government but also understands Washington politics. For those like Romney who seek to solve some of the country’s economic woes with a compromised middle way while energizing the smaller government base, he is the perfect choice.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

David John. Marotta CFP®, AIF®, is President of Marotta Wealth Management, Inc. of Charlottesville providing fee-only financial planning and wealth management at www.emarotta.com. Subscribe to his blog at www.marottaonmoney.com. Questions to be answered in the column should be sent to questions at emarotta dot com or Marotta Wealth Management, Inc., One Village Green Circle, Suite 100, Charlottesville, VA 22903-4619.
David John Marotta
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

Featured Articles


South Dakota ACT Scores Above National Average


South Dakota’s average composite ACT score remains unchanged from last year at 21.8, where it has been for the past three years. The national average was also unchanged from a year ago, sitting at 21.1 as it has for four of the past five years. While South Dakota’s scores are consistently higher than the national average by several tenths of a point, South Dakota Secretary of Education Dr. Melody Schopp says there is always room for improvement.

question mark

Our National Question Mark

Jim Bowman

As we are quickly approaching America’s political cliff, we must look back to what caused this absurd presidential quandary. Nameless grunts in and out of government have combined to rubber stamp a candidate who to this day remains a question mark. I know the question seems ridiculous, but just who is Obama?

Delta Force bodyguards flank General Norman Schwarzkopf as he visits US forces that took part in Operation Desert Storm, 1991

I Knew God Was With Us

William J. Federer

Born AUGUST 22, 1934, he served in Vietnam, commanded the U.S. forces in Grenada and Desert Storm, was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal and knighted by the Queen of England. This was four-star General "Stormin Norman" Schwarzkopf.

Westboro Baptist Church protesters and Patriot Guard Riders, 2008 (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Westboro: The Famous Church of Hate

Carrie K. Hutchens

Westboro's, the famous church of hate, seemed to be slowing down, but it appears they have merely been changing tactics or adding to them. They've moved on from protesting at funerals for servicemen or women, and have now set their sights on GaymerCon, a homosexual gamer's convention. Whether you believe homosexual behavior is right or wrong, is the Westboro "Baptist" Church's venomous tactic the right way to approach this issue?

South Dakota

2012 South Dakota Freedom Index Released

Bob Ellis

The South Dakota Freedom Coalition has released the 2012 South Dakota Freedom Index. This annual scorecard is an attempt to provide the people of South Dakota a useful and educational snapshot of how their state legislators voted and to apply some basic prniciples of good government in evaluating their performance in Pierre. Issues examined include concealed carry permits, state-level ObamaCare, illegal immigration, abortion and wealth redistribution.


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

Authors (with latest article)

  • Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

Switch to our mobile site

NewMedia blog