Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these. — Sir William Blackstone, 18th Century English jurist, author of Commentaries on the Laws of England

Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

August 2, 2012   ·   By   ·   1 Comments

red tapeIn a 245-172 vote in the House on July 26, the House passed H.R. 4078, the Red Tape Reduction and Small Business Job Creation Act. This legislation, if passed by the Senate and signed by the President, would stop the federal government from imposing many harmful regulations that cripple job creation until the unemployment rate dips below 6 percent.

This is a great step in the right direction to put an end to the out-of-control federal government that regulates everything it can get its hands on. Unfortunately, Harry Reid will block this attempt at stopping Big Government from ever seeing the light of day in the Senate and Obama has promised to veto this bill should it ever reach his desk. So don’t expect too much action on an item of this nature this year, or as long as Reid and Obama remain in their positions of power.

Taxpayers should be clamoring to know why such modest legislation is being blocked from consideration by the likes of Mr. Reid and Mr. Obama — especially legislation that will benefit all Americans. After all, if the legislation stops job-killing regs, it cannot be good for those regs to be imposed even if unemployment is below 6 percent. The federal government is forcing businesses to run up a huge bill just to comply with the regs. And that cost is also passed on to consumers.

Just how much are federal government regulations costing American businesses? According to Henry I. Miller of the Hoover Institution, the cost to comply with federal regulations is an astounding $1.75 trillion annually!

And all the while, politicians are parading around the country seeking votes this November by employing rhetoric that they are fixing the government by encouraging job growth.

While 172 members of the House seem to be fine with the regulatory burden that exists in America right now, there are plenty more who oppose it at least enough to roll back many regs temporarily. For example, Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) rose up in support of the legislation and gave a floor speech that will be long remembered by those that saw it.

But what is most troubling about the out-of-control actions the government takes to regulate everything it sees is how Congress has abdicated their authority on the matter. Congress has taken to passing laws and allowing regulators in the bureaucracy to write what those laws mean through the various regs that they put out. The result is that members of Congress deflect blame from bad regulations by saying they didn’t do it and that they want to get it under control. They passed the law though that allowed the bureaucrat to come up with the rules!

Also, Congress is passing laws that bureaucrats effectively write after the fact. The Dodd-Frank financial takeover bill that was passed two years ago is still being written by the regulators. Congress passed it and the President signed it nearly two years ago!

And who can forget Nancy Pelosi’s famous words in the lead-up to passage of ObamaCare in 2010 when she said that we would all have to wait to see what is inside the bill until it is passed (and the regulators write it).

Congressmen are effectively useless at this point since the millions of bureaucrats under the employ of the federal government are the ones actually defining legislation and crafting the government powers and regulations.

As regulations keep piling up in Washington, D.C. to the detriment of businesses and consumers across the country (and world), Harry Reid and Barack Obama are all that stand in the way of a temporary reprieve from the heavy hand of government. The fact that Reid won’t bring this up for a vote in the Senate is all the more evidence that Congress has turned away from crafting the laws of the land and instead has issued a blanket authorization to thousands of federal government regulators to do whatever they want to you.


Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.


Similar Posts:

Adam Bitely is the Editor-in-Chief of NetRightDaily.com. You can follow him on Twitter at @AdamBitely.
Adam Bitely
View all articles by Adam Bitely
Adams website
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

Featured Articles

Homeland Security flag (Photo credit: Bill Koplitz)

Unelected Muslims Dictate US Training Policy on Islam

Gina Miller

Do the anti-Americans in the current communist Democrat administration in Washington honestly believe that by eradicating anything “offensive” to Muslims from our national policies and institutions that Muslims will suddenly start “liking” us? Or is it more likely that the goons in the Obama regime are fully on-board with the Muslim goal of silencing any criticism of Islam?

pillars

Our Constitution was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People

William J. Federer

On OCTOBER 11, 1798, President John Adams wrote to the 1st Brigade, 3rd Division of Massachusetts' Militia: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

prison

Convicted Murderer’s Execution Challenge Dismissed

Newswire

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announced today that Judge Lawrence L. Piersol dismissed a constitutional challenge to South Dakota’s method of execution brought by death row inmate Donald Moeller. Judge Piersol’s ruling follows a hearing on October 4, 2012, during which Moeller told the court “I want to pay what I owe. I believe the death penalty is just in this case.”

Big_Bird_Hillary_f

Big Bird: A Symbol of the 2012 Election

Rick Manning

Perhaps those who believe that Big Bird, Elmo, Kermit and Miss Piggy need a taxpayer subsidy to help with early childhood education missed the “Tickle me Elmo” craze that generated millions of dollars, and they undoubtedly were unaware that Kermit and Miss Piggy went Hollywood a long time ago making millions in the process. Or, perhaps they haven’t flipped around to the hundreds of channels on their televisions and envisioned the bidding war to bring Big Bird to a privately funded station. As strange as it might seem, Big Bird just might be the perfect symbol for this election.

healthcare

Should Government Ration Health Care?

Ken Connor

This year the U.S. is expected to spend $2.8 trillion on health care. The tab for Medicare alone will likely cost taxpayers $590 billion, with 25% of that sum going for patients in their last year of life. Given the anemic state of our economy and the huge strain on our medical resources, should government step in and decide how care is to be allocated among the sick and dying? Should Big Brother determine whose life is worth saving and whose is not by rationing health care?

Archives

Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

Authors (with latest article)

  • Bureaucratic Red Tape Strangles Jobs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

NewMedia blog