The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government — Thomas Jefferson, From a letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Citizens of Washington County, Maryland 31 March 1809

Hijacking and Perverting Conservatism

July 20, 2012   ·   By   ·   3 Comments

whitewashWhen I read the title of a Daily Caller op/ed called “The freedom to marry: a conservative value,” I thought, “What now?”

I know liberals well enough to know that only they would be obtuse enough to talk about “freedom” to “marry.”

Aside from the obvious fact that all Americans enjoy the freedom to marry (no one enjoys the freedom to call something by a title when that something does not accurately describe it, and you need a man and a woman to form a marriage, just like you need male and female plumbing parts to create a bathroom), the legitimization of homosexual behavior is not and will never be a conservative value; it is a liberal “value.”

The counterfeiting of marriage by homosexual couples is not and will never be a conservative value; it is a liberal “value.”

While it may be that there are some deluded “conservatives” out there who, while embracing the liberal positions of accepting homosexual behavior and/or counterfeiting marriage, are otherwise conservative in the majority of their values (e.g. they are for limited government, fiscal responsibility, low taxes, pro-life, pro-American, support law and order, support the Constitution, etc.), supporting the counterfeiting of marriage by homosexuals cannot under any rational circumstances be considered a “conservative” value.

Calling support for the counterfeiting of marriage by homosexuals “conservative” is like calling a rib-eye steak “vegan” food.

To see this kind of Orwellian hijacking of language forces me once again to ask myself concerning liberals: are they this stupid, or do they think the rest of us are?

It’s a longshot that you would ever find a conservative who supported a liberal position like counterfeiting marriage while being genuinely conservative on most other issues; that kind of philosophical dichotomy just isn’t manageable for most folks, even liberals. There are too many fundamental worldview presuppositions accepted by a genuine conservative to allow for this kind of aberration on marriage and sexuality; there are also too many fundamental worldview presuppositions accepted by liberals to allow them to accept a majority of conservative values while believing in the counterfeiting of marriage.

Therefore, it is only rational to assume that these “conservatives” who supposedly support the counterfeiting of marriage are, at best, libertarians, not conservatives.

While there are many shades of libertarianism (I have some libertarian friends-or more accurately, “conservative friends with some libertarian leanings,” and I know that what I’m about to say wouldn’t describe most of them), for the most part, the only thing pure libertarianism has in common with conservatism is the desire for limited government. However, the reason libertarians and conservatives desire limited government spring from two very different fundamental assumptions, and have two very different goals in mind. Conservatives want limited government because, in addition to the U.S. Constitution mandating it, we realize limited government curtails tyranny and protects freedom. Libertarians want limited government because they feel it will give them the freedom to use recreational drugs, visit prostitutes, and engage in whatever self-destructive practices ignite their fancy. Conservatives realize that immoral acts-even those that seem to be “victimless”-virtually always hurt others, and undermine the moral fabric of society, placing everyone’s stability and welfare at risk. For the garden variety libertarian, these dangers are ignored in in the face of their imperative to feed their personal desires. When it comes down to it, conservatives seek liberty while libertarians seek license; ultimately, if you desire license, you are just a liberal in practice if not in principle. In any case, libertarianism is NOT conservatism.

It is entirely possible, too, that these “conservatives” are nothing but liberals masquerading as conservatives for the purpose of creating confusion and devaluing/undermining the conservative brand. Liberals have already done this with the conservative party of record-the Republican Party-both nationally and sometimes on a state level, where people can no longer rely on “Republican” to mean that the official will support the documented conservative values of the Republican Party. Indeed, it was this watering-down of the Republican brand that led to the “Republican” loss of control of congress in 2006 (after having expanded government and spent like drunken sailors for five years), and led to the election of Barack Obama in 2008 after nominating a RINO for president.

There would be no Tea Party movement if Republicans had acted like Republicans over the past decade.

Conservatives, we need to push back and speak out against this latest attempt to hijack and render worthless the meaning of the word “conservative” as liberals have done to the meaning of the word “Republican.”  We need to make it clear in no uncertain terms that if someone insists on promoting or advocating counterfeit marriage, theirs is a LIBERAL position.

The modern Left has made full reality of George Orwell’s statement that “Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.”

Too much of the English language has been rendered useless by the Orwellian Left-and they like it that way, for it creates the darkness and confusion they need to attain their goals. We must hold the line-and reverse this assault on reality.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Bob Ellis has been the owner of Dakota Voice, LLC since 2005. He is a 10-year veteran of the United States Air Force, a public writer for the past decade, and has been involved in numerous election and public policy campaigns for nearly 20 years, including a Tea Party leader and organizer since 2009. He lives in Rapid City, South Dakota with his wife and two children.
Bob Ellis
View all articles by Bob Ellis
Bobs website
Print Friendly

If you enjoyed this article, please consider leaving a comment below (subject to the comment guidelines listed at the bottom of the article), sharing it to Facebook or Twitter or another social media site, subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader, or have a daily digest of the latest American Clarion articles delivered to your email inbox each morning..

  • DCM7

    Actually, I suspect the reality is this: Liberals just know that, in order for them to have power and influence, a certain number of people have to really be that stupid; and, unfortunately, at least that many actually are.

  • retiredday

    Great article. There’s nothing so irksome as liberals redefining conservative values for us and “hijacking language” to do it. It just makes me want to get in their face and scream, “Don’t tell me what I believe!”

    The crux of the matter is that homosexuals already have the same right to marriage as heterosexuals do. But since marriage is, always has been and always will be the union of a man and a woman, homosexuals are constrained to change the meaning of marriage to suit themselves. Marriage cannot exist between two individuals of the same gender. Such a relationship is not marriage, it’s something else. A tree is a tree is a tree, and it will always remain a tree, regardless of anyone’s attempt to redefine it.

  • thisoldspouse

    Last year, I got done working for a family of liberals who called themselves “conservatives”; some of the nastiest, most vindictive, fake, psychotic people I’ve ever met. They were members at the large conservative Baptist Church that my mom attends (but they rarely attend), but are all about appearances. Unless they are enlightened by the Spirit and repent, they will be surprised when they finally meet their Judge.

    I really believe that there are people who think they believe they are conservative, because they are enabled into thinking this by other RINO’s in their sphere of living. This is the deadly danger of compromising conservatism, in government or daily life.

Featured Articles


Culture of Death and the Batman Shooting

J. Matt Barber

At the time of this writing, I’m sitting just a few miles from a Century 16 theatre in Aurora, Colo., where, in the early morning hours of July 20, 2012, a deranged, fame-starved gunman shot dead at least 12 innocent people and wounded scores more at a midnight showing of “The Dark Knight Rises,” a Batman sequel. Clearly, what our nation needs is more “separation of church and state.” If those obnoxious, right-wing Bible thumpers would simply quit bellowing about the need for revival – a return to the deeply held Judeo-Christian principles embraced by our Founding Fathers – America would be a much better place.

Lawless America

Lawless America — The Movie’ & the Filming of the Gary & Sara Harvey Case

Carrie K. Hutchens

The Star Gazette's Ray Finger was on hand during filming for "Lawless America -- The Movie", which took place Thursday, July 19, 2012 in Elmira, New York. The subjects of the Elmira segment were Gary & Sara Harvey and the government officials and their attorneys who have kept Gary Harvey isolated in a hospital room with little stimulation and extremely restricted visitation. The once silenced truth is about to make it's way to the screen in shocking revelation.


American Clarion Week in Review, Ending Jul. 21, 2012

Bob Ellis

These were the top articles at American Clarion over the past week, including: The Constitution, Vattel, and 'Natural Born Citizen': What Our Framers Knew; The Obama Verdict; SD Attorney General Responds to Request for Secretary of State Investigation; Homosexual Pedophile Activist Targets MassResistance with Million-Dollar Lawsuit; In 2016, What Would Obama's America Look Like?; A New Dark Age Lighted by Perverted Science; Clergy Starting to Speak Out Against Marxism; What 'These Hands' Can Produce; and more!

Carl Sandburg

America in the Crimson Light

William J. Federer

"A baby is God's opinion that the world should go on," wrote poet Carl Sandburg, who died JULY 22, 1967. A son of Swedish immigrants who worked on the railroad, Sandburg left school after 8th grade, borrowed his father's railroad pass and traveled as a hobo. He volunteered for military service, was sent to Puerto Rico in the Spanish-American War, and then attended college on a veteran's bill. Carl Sandburg wrote children's fairytales, called Rootabaga Stories, and mused of his wanderings in American Songbag. In 1926, he wrote Abraham Lincoln-The Prairie Years, and in 1939 he wrote Abraham Lincoln-The War Years, for which he received a Pulitzer Prize.


Rep. Allen West on National Defense

Bob Ellis

This half-hour video is from a recent speech at Eagle Forum by Rep. Allen West (R-FL). West primarily discusses the practical and constitutional role of defense in the life of the United States, but also touches on other important subjects. It is well worth 30 minutes of your time.


Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

Like American Clarion

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964

Switch to our mobile site

NewMedia blog