With only days to go before America decides who will occupy the White House, it is abundantly clear that Democrats are rousing every effort to appeal to the vast crowd of “millennial” voters.

There is little doubt that if Hillary Clinton ran for the office of president during the Roosevelt or Reagan era, she would not have gone very far in the primaries, if she was able to get on the ballot at all. Times have changed.

The thing about politics that is easy to disdain is that it more often than not uses words to cover and mask serious errors in judgment with more publicly acceptable rhetorical phrases and words. Wickedness and immorality are clandestinely draped with words like liberalism, inclusion, civil rights and safety.

It is now abundantly clear that Hillary’s basket is full of soft pedals from the most beautiful flowers which she spreads at the feet of her adorers a she crosses the country making flowery speeches. But just underneath the top layer of pedals is a thick rotting layer of leaves, all with their own imprint.

During this election cycle in the United States, the issues cited and heralded as the ‘most important’ are security and prosperity. Both candidates for president are using the same rhetoric and both claim they will bring security and great prosperity to us all-if they are elected.

Now we are called aside again to what might well be the final death blow, this time it comes from the left’s best presidential candidate: Ms. Hillary Clinton. She appears in rallies and venues across the country with the latest and best offering of the liberal machine. She is calling America aside, with soft rhetoric; she asks us to believe her intentions, but we already know her intentions and her record; that is why we must not answer her deceptive call.

Long before Matt Barber published “Hating Jesus” I was reading Matt’s articles online. I always marveled at his writing skills which mimicked his skill in the art of pugilism, (boxing) the similarities were unmistakable. He always knows his opponents style and after sizing them up puts forth an amazing form that catches them off guard.

Are there really “moral responsibilities” to be regarded in an election? In fact, there are and one of the most rudimentary of them all is the need to elect people who are basically honest. Hillary Clinton’s dishonesty in the handling of her emails and her role in the lies fostered immediately following the slaughter of Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi. These should be clues enough for the nation to doubt Clinton, but the real clincher about Hillary’s dishonesty requires only an ordinary calculator and not inside information from the State Department.

On April 2, 1917 President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war against Germany, stating “The world must be made safe for democracy.” Has President Barack Obama now made the world “safe for sodomy”?

The main stream media made a big deal of Melania’s speech at the RNC even after the entire matter was all but dismissed by Donald Trump. No heads are going to roll and the Dem’s have already begun to use the word “liar” even though their candidate, Hillary Clinton, may have given the term more meaning in her lifetime than Daniel Webster could with the entire force of his almost unlimited etymological expertise.