I understand that RINO Jack Siebold thinks South Dakota Dist. 33 Senator Phil Jensen is “good for the Democrat Party.” Well, if you define “good for the Democrat Party” as being an ardent opponent of the Democrat Party’s morally bankrupt policies and war on freedom and family, then I suppose that would be accurate.

Apparently there remains at least one prominent Republican who is willing to fight for traditional American values like innocent human life and marriage. The Des Moines Register interviewed Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) yesterday about Senator Rand Paul’s (R-KY) recent comments about abandoning social conservatism to please liberals.

Nearly four years since and the world is a much meaner place — due mostly to the fact that there is no policeman prowling the globe.. Allow me to amend that and say the policeman may still be on the beat, at least to an extent, but he is now disarmed. That may be a better description of the current attitude of America in global affairs. The US has the weakest presidency and the weakest State Department in my memory of well over seven decades.

In this era of the democratic electorate sitting docilely on their collective butts while government bureaucrats, career politicians and slick-talking shysters masquerading as representatives of the people ever more boldly demolish, steal, give away and otherwise destroy the rights and freedoms established by our Founders, it’s fitting that the words of H.L. Mencken, one of this country’s greatest supporters of liberty, be revisited.

Some random philosophy professor from the Rochester Institute of Technology named Lawrence Torcello has decided that if you don’t agree with him on climate change, then you should be criminally prosecuted. Here is his actual quote in the UK journal, “The Conversation”, “We have good reason to consider the funding of climate denial to be criminally and morally negligent.”

At one Indianapolis shop, 111 Cakery almost turned into a 911 for religious liberty. Like most Christians in the wedding business, Randy and Trish McGath knew the risks of turning down an order for a same-sex ceremony. In their industry, word was spreading fast about the price of standing up for your faith — from florists and facilities rentals to caterers and bed and breakfasts.

Today’s believer must guard against two faithless extremes: Apathy & Theocracy Neither position is a true representation of the faith.

Imagine that you are hired to do a risk analysis to verify claims that the foundation of a 200-year old magnificent building can be altered without impacting the building’s strength or stability. Your experience in analyzing risk has taught you that it involves asking (and answering) three basic questions: 1) What could go wrong?; 2) What are the chances it will go wrong?; and, 3) What are the consequences if it does go wrong?

Have you ever been frightened for your safety. Perhaps you parked your car in the city during daylight hours, only to return after dark. You walk down the street that seemed fine in the daylight, but at night there is a whole different sense. You look nervously over your shoulder, concerned that this doesn’t seem a safe part of the city. >