Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers. — John Jay, First Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court


EB-5 Visa Bill Heard in South Dakota Committee

February 20, 2014   ·   By   ·   1 Comments

Immigrant_Investor_ProgramA bill to end South Dakota’s participation the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program was heard in the South Dakota House State Affairs Committee yesterday.

HB 1167 was crafted in the wake of last year’s South Dakota scandal involving Northern Beef, the EB-5 program and the South Dakota Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED).

EB-5 is an immigrant visa program which, in exchange for green cards, requires foreign investors to invest at least $500,000 in a project designed to create jobs. In this case, that involved Northern Beef, and the controversial suicide of former governor Mike Rounds’ Director of Economic Development Richard Benda.

In addition to the unusual suicide of Benda, the scandal involves money paid out by the state on the failed venture which cannot be recovered for the taxpayers, as well as audit reports which have found problems with the procedures used in the program. Additionally, there are national security concerns over the EB-5 program; the Northern Beef scandal involved Chinese investors. With Governor Dennis Daugaard courting business relations with China, these concerns are ongoing.

Prime sponsor Rep. Stace Nelson began his testimony about HB 1167 by handing out a memo by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA)  about the EB-5 program, and a memo from former CIA Director James Woolsey about threats to America. Nelson said that before serving in the legislature, he was an NCIS agent where he dealt with counterterrorism, force protection, intelligence and other matters in addition to law enforcement duties. Nelson said that without divulging any classified information, all the open source information indicates that China is a threat to the United States economically and militarily. Referencing the Grassley memo, Nelson said it outlines the susceptibility of our nation to foreign threats through this program, and pointed out that the memo also has an attachment from U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement outlining that agency’s concerns about the EB-5 program.

Nelson said he had assisted his constituents in Hanson County in opposing an EB-5 program involving investors from South Korea in a large corporate dairy farm. Nelson said the operation was looking for a large TIF (Tax Increment Financing) break that would have taken years to pay off, and also mentioned the cost to the taxpayers of the Northern Beef project. Nelson said he had not heard from a single South Dakotan who liked the program or the “crony capitalism” involved. Nelson said that like many others, he believes in the free market and that the government should not be picking winners and losers in the market. Nelson said his constituents in Hanson County didn’t pay their taxes to have those taxes used to finance businesses to compete with their own.

Pat Costello of the Governors Office of Economic Development spoke in opposition, stating that the EB-5 program is a federal program that will likely continue whether or not the state of South Dakota is involved. Costello said his office believes there will be opportunities in the future to use the program as an economic incentive tool.

In rebuttal, Nelson said that the scandals we’ve already seen should be enough for us to realize that the state should not be involved. Nelson said he knew of no one in their right mind who considered it prudent to get involved with communist China. Nelson found it incredulous that anyone would be “falling all over themselves to get access to this money” to involve communist China with the food production industry of America. Nelson said that although EB-5 is a federal program, the state of South Dakota can decide not to be involved with it.

Rep. David Novstrup made a motion to kill the bill, which was seconded by Rep. Dean Wink. Novstrup said that while we all have concerns with the program, perhaps the federal government should reform it, and that the state’s lack of involvement in the program wouldn’t stop businesses from seeking foreign investors on their own.

Rep. Bernie Hunhoff said that if other states continued to have access to the EB-5 program, South Dakota would put itself at a disadvantage by not using it.

The bill was killed on a 12-1 vote:

Conzet Yea Gibson Yea Gosch Yea
Hunhoff (Bernie) Yea Killer Nay Munsterman Yea
Novstrup (David) Yea Parsley Yea Verchio Yea
Westra Yea Wink Yea Cronin Yea
Lust Yea

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Bob Ellis has been the owner of media company Dakota Voice, LLC since 2005. He is a 10-year veteran of the United States Air Force, a political writer for the past decade, and has been involved in numerous election and public policy campaigns for nearly 20 years, including a Tea Party leader and organizer since 2009. He lives in Rapid City, South Dakota with his wife and two children.
Bob Ellis
View all articles by Bob Ellis
Leave a comment with your Facebook login
Print Friendly

Readers Comments (1)

Sorry, comments are closed on this post.

Fundamentally transforming America

   From Americans for Limited Government

Featured Articles

Photo credit: CyberXRef

Despite liberal howls, Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling was right

Star Parker

Why exactly is it that Democrats find the Hobby Lobby decision so outrageous that in America religious freedom is respected? That we have law – The Religious Freedom Restoration Act under which the owners of Hobby Lobby sued the federal government – that assures that no federal law will substantially burden individuals in the practice of their religion. Paying for contraception would violate the Christian principles of Hobby Lobby’s owners.


Gordon Howie: Most Conservative in All the Races

Bob Ellis

David Montgomery has a very interesting post at the Argus Leader about the ideological gap of Democrat versus Republican candidates in several U.S. Senate races. In the South Dakota, RINO Mike Rounds comes in about where you'd expect: the mushy middle at +52 on their scale, while Democrat Rick Weiland comes in at -41.

President George W. Bush and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin Friday, Sept. 2, 2005

Demand punishment of government corruption

Bradlee Dean

Often times in America, it seems as if there is no light at the end of the tunnel concerning national affairs. In particular, America is inundated with the crimes of those who represent and serve “We the People,” and often the American people are under the impression that criminal representatives suffer no consequence. But every once in a while, America can see how the judicial system is at work and what its righteous effects are on a corrupt system.


Gordon Howie Takes the High Road

Bob Ellis

Last night I noticed that I had started seeing Gordon Howie for U.S. Senate signs popping up around Rapid Valley. Today I got a picture of the third one I was not able to capture last night, plus a fourth that I saw anew today.


‘I Won’t Believe in a God Like That’

David Mann

When "religion" (i.e., Christianity) is being discussed, there will often be someone chiming in with a statement along the lines of "I won't believe in a god who would sentence people to eternal punishment" or "I wouldn't worship a god who would drown babies." As common as sentiments like these are, there are huge, glaring problems with the thinking behind them.


"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964