The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. — Thomas Jefferson

Which World Do You Live In?

July 9, 2012   ·   By   ·   1 Comments

fantasyIn the course of various discussions about frequently debated subjects, I have observed that there are some people whose viewpoints indicate that they live in the real world, and others whose viewpoints indicate that they live in a fantasy world. By the latter, I refer to people who assume that certain things are true that really aren’t, and that certain things have happened that never really did or could.

Sometimes their assumptions are stated directly; other times they make assumptions in their statements that they would not actually come right out and admit to, and that they might not even realize they’re making. Most such people seem to simply not know better, because they’ve been taught all their lives that the fantasy world is real. But often, all it takes to see the difference between the real world and the fantasy world is to recognize the difference between how things actually work and how some people wish they worked.

In the fantasy world, the right thing for a person to do is whatever the person happens to want to do. They should not expect to have to take responsibility for their actions, nor to experience the consequences of those actions.

In the real world, the right thing for a person to do is very often not what they naturally want to do. Responsibility must take precedence over rights, and natural consequences for all actions are to be expected.

In the fantasy world, skin color is a stronger distinguishing factor than gender — a person’s race makes a great deal of difference, while their gender makes none. In fact, the genders are entirely interchangeable for all purposes, even sexual ones.

In the real world, race is superficial and meaningless, and gender is not. Each gender, particularly in family contexts, has distinct and irreplaceable roles and abilities. A man cannot be a wife or mother, and a woman cannot be a husband or father.

In the fantasy world, one has the right to any sexual partner, or partners, they want, and neither moral nor even legal considerations should be allowed to get in the way.

In the real world, sex needs to be kept within very specific boundaries because it comes with great power and, therefore, great responsibility.

In the fantasy world, abortion clients are almost exclusively married women who have too many children already and cannot afford birth control, or women who require it for medical reasons. Therefore abortion is a vital and indispensable service, as well as one that poses no risk or harm to women. It is also acceptable because a child doesn’t actually become human until birth, or perhaps shortly thereafter.

In the real world, abortion clients are primarily young girls who are not ready to be having sex in the first place, and whose partners are neither qualified nor willing to make appropriate commitments to them; many have gotten pregnant while using ineffective pills or condoms provided to them by “family planning” clinics hoping to get business from them. Effective birth control (a.k.a. “conception prevention”) is inexpensive and readily available to those who actually need it, and cases where there might arguably be medical justification for abortion are extremely rare. Abortion is also objectionable because a child is fully human once conceived, regardless of what state of development they’re in (generally an advanced one by the time the mother even knows she’s pregnant), and because it causes significant psychological — and, frequently, physical — harm to women.

In the fantasy world, homosexuality is a black-and-white, innate and unchangeable orientation, and the only difference between “gay” people and others is that the former are naturally sexually attracted to their own gender instead of the opposite one.

In the real world, same-sex attraction is a behavioral disorder, largely based in environmental and experiential factors, that occurs in a full range of severity. It does not lend itself to relationships that are stable and monogamous beyond superficial appearances. Like other such issues it tends to be very deeply entrenched, but it has frequently been overcome by those who have recognized the need for doing so.

In the fantasy world, science has shown that any kind of greater, supreme Designer is such an absolute impossibility that the very idea must not be discussed or even mentioned among intelligent people. The idea that life came together by itself via entirely natural processes is a firm certainty requiring no further proof than already exists.

In the real world, our lives and everything around us — as fallen and imperfect as it all has become — cannot be explained without reference to the Creator. The idea that life came together by itself via entirely natural processes, regardless of its popularity among otherwise intelligent people, has been shown by modern discoveries to be absolutely impossible. It is not an inevitable, or even reasonable, conclusion from the evidence, but can only serve as the starting assumption for what is ultimately a make-believe scenario.

The problem with living in the fantasy world is that, ultimately, everyone will be subject to the rules and conditions of the real world. Therefore, the sooner any given person leaves the fantasy world to come live in the real one, the better.


Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.



Similar Posts:

David Mann is a Christian who lives in Florida.
David Mann
View all articles by David Mann
Print Friendly
Clip to Evernote
  • retiredday

    Nice article. Your point is well-made. I’m sure you could have included many more comparisons, but that would probably have filled an entire book. I think the reason so many folks live in their little fantasy worlds is that society has gone away from the idea of a Creator God who holds us accountable to his authority.

    Today, children are taught a brand of “self-esteem” that equates to a sort of ego-centrism that society is obligated to support. The idea that a child can choose his own gender identity places him above the authority of his Creator. It’s common now to hear people say, “That may be true for you, but it isn’t true for me.” What that means is that they believe there is no authoritative truth (or reality), to which everyone must ascribe.

    I recently heard an atheist accusing religious people of making the error of referring to the authoritative source for what was said, rather than just referring to what was said. He used the example of Jesus Christ and said just because Jesus said it doesn’t mean it must be true. In his fantasy world, he is the ultimate judge of all things. He accepts no authority that holds him accountable. The sad thing is that his rebellion will only last as long as the LORD allows. In the end, he will have to stand before his Creator and pay the consequences of choosing fantasy over reality.

Featured Articles

evolution

The ‘Mountain of Evidence’ For Evolution

Bob Ellis

Evolutionists want everyone to believe their idea is a fact. Evolutionists cultivate a perception that there is a "mountain of evidence" that is monolithic, that proves beyond any doubt that evolution is a fact. The reality is much, much different. Check out this evidence of Creation Magazine Live to learn more of the specifics about the "mountain of evidence" for evolution.

EW_Jackson

E.W. Jackson enhances GOP’s Virginia ticket

Star Parker

Bishop E.W. Jackson is an outspoken black Christian conservative with a law degree from Harvard. He also was just selected as the nominee for lieutenant governor of Virginia. He is outspoken about limited government and personal freedom, about the importance of family and traditional marriage, and about doing something about the scourge of abortion. In other words, E.W. Jackson stands for everything that the Republican Party once stood for. He's making the Republicans of inclusion squirm.

ADHD

Father of ADHD calls himself a liar

Bradlee Dean

“ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease.” These were the words of Leon Eisenberg, the “scientific father of ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder),” in his last interview before his death. The medical industry is using the guise of helping children to depersonalize and disconnect our children from a healthy, normal upbringing.

Marco Rubio (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Rubio Has Liberal Record on Immigration in Florida Legislature

Bob Ellis

Like many conservatives, I once thought Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) was a solid, reliable conservative. Then he joined with the so-called "Gang of 8" in crafting a sellout amnesty proposal that Rubio and some others still claim isn't amnesty even though it clearly is. Now his liberal illegal immigration record in the Florida legislature is coming to light, and some things are suddenly becoming more clear.

Levantino

Former Abortion Doctor Testifies FOR Abortion Ban

Bob Ellis

Dr. Anthony Levantino is a New Mexico doctor who previously performed 1,200 abortions. After his own daughter died in a tragic accident, he began a process of self examination. He now realizes the truth about abortion.

Archives

Other News

Other Commentary

Featured Blogs

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all." - Ronald Reagan, Nov. 10, 1964