During the legislative crackerbarrel meeting in Rapid City today, Brian Johnson, who recently testified in favor of the bill in Pierre, pointed out that there is a lot of misinformation from the media and others about SB 55 . The bill says
No teacher may be prohibited from helping students understand, analyze, critique, or review in an objective scientific manner the strengths and weaknesses of scientific information presented in courses being taught which are aligned with the content standards established pursuant to § 13-3-48.
It was noted that there are no competing ideas such as creation or intelligent design in the content standards. The bill would allow teachers to teach strengths and weaknesses about those theories within the content standards. Theories such as evolution and the Big Bang are based on assumptions, and these assumptions are continually challenged by new scientific findings. Teachers aren’t forced to teach the weaknesses if they don’t want to; they are only allowed to if they want to. The legislators seemed to agree with the assertions of the audience member. Russell said that on the Senate floor, the Left tried to give the impression that this would allow content that isn’t in the content standard, but that is clearly not the case according to the language of the bill.
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.