Benghazi eyewitness never contacted by Feds

sean-hannityAs riveting and informative as the testimony of Benghazi personnel is I fear the administration will continue to stonewall.  With a sycophant media, or Ministry of Propaganda, the administration will continue to deny and diminish testimony until Americans become numb to the atrocity and the cruel neglect that led to the deaths of four Americans.  We can’t let this happen.  There has yet to be a thorough investigation of the events of September 11, 2012.  This recording from the Sean Hannity Radio Show provides additional evidence that the Feds have little interest in gathering facts.  This is all about cover for heartless political decisions, gross incompetence and demonstrable lies, all hallmarks of the Obama regime.

In this phone call the caller identifies himself as a drone operator that operated one of the spy drones that watched as the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission unfolded.  He describes in detail what he saw.  The immediate question is, who watched this in real time within the National Security Agency?  The caller informs us that these spy missions are all recorded and archived.  So why haven’t we heard of this evidence and why hasn’t this eyewitness been called to testify?  (Granted, we can’t, at this point, verify that this gentleman is who he says he is, but his technical knowledge and vivid descriptions of what he saw adds credence to his account.)

8 Comments

  1. retiredday says:

    It’s incomprehensible to me that those conducting the Benghazi hearings aren’t aware of this information. Just like the infamous “show trials” of the old Soviet Union, our glorious government conducts most of their business for show. As long as they can convince enough voters that Big Brother is looking out for them, they could care less about getting to the truth. Most of all, they are concerned with their image and focus on feeding the propaganda machine. I’m not saying they all do it, but those in charge do. They’ve got too big a cash cow to risk losing by allowing themselves to be held accountable to the people.

    • Bob Ellis says:

      Like Secretary of State Hillary said, “What does it matter?”

      They have a fundamental transformation of America to accomplish! Can’t let a silly thing like a terrorist attack on our people get in the way of that!

      • retiredday says:

        Absolutely! And they just might get away with it, if enough Americans have that same “I don’t care” attitude.

  2. WXRGina says:

    This whole ordeal is yet another damning event that should bring some serious criminal charges on this administration–in a sane world it should. In the actions, inactions, lies and cover-up, these worms were giving aid and comfort to our enemies in Libya, while they deliberately let four Americans be murdered. This is treason.

    I missed this call on Sean’s show, but the first thing I noticed is that the caller right off the bat didn’t sound like a military man. All the service members I’ve heard talk on the radio or most anywhere else reply “yes, sir,” or “no, sir.” To a man they do this. This guy didn’t say “sir,” but that could just be our “new military” under Big O, even though the guy said he’d been doing this about ten years.

    • retiredday says:

      Good point, about saying, “yes sir”. Although flight officers may be a bit more loose. I tend to believe him. But wouldn’t it be nice if we had a chain of command we could trust? Who knows whom to trust any more (as far as leadership is concerned). I implicitly trust the “troops on the ground”.

      • WXRGina says:

        That’s it, Mike–today we don’t trust or believe anything out of the federal government. That’s why conspiracy ideas are abounding like never before.

    • dr. theo says:

      Good point, Gina. I have been out of the Army for forty years and I still say “Yes, sir” and “No, Ma’am” in some situations. It is also possible that this fellow may be a “contractor” and not a military officer. With revelations today that there were at least a dozen revisions of the “talking points” before sending Susan Rice out to lie to Americans, the testimony of every potential witness must be pursued.