Constitutionality of South Dakota’s Lethal Injection Protocol Upheld

gavelFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE : Thursday, February 28, 2013
CONTACT: Sara Rabern (605)773-3215

PIERRE, S.D.- Today Judge Thomas Trimble of the Seventh Circuit Court in Pennington County issued an opinion rejecting Charles Russell Rhines’ constitutional challenge to South Dakota’s method of execution protocol. Rhines is on death row for the 1992 murder of Donnivan Schaeffer in Rapid City.

Rhines filed a habeas corpus action claiming that South Dakota’s protocol violated constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. Rhines alleged that he faced a substantial risk of pain because the protocol did not assure that the lethal drug would be sufficiently potent or properly administered.

The Trial Court found that South Dakota’s protocol, which is modeled on one approved by the United States Supreme Court, does not pose a risk of unconstitutional pain and suffering. “Lethal injection is the most humane manner of implementing the death penalty,” the Court wrote in its opinion. The Court concluded that “South Dakota’s lethal injection protocol is substantially similar to, and in many respects more protective than” the protocol approved by the United States Supreme Court and, therefore, is “constitutional on its face.”

South Dakota currently uses a single dose of pentobarbital to carry out executions. This protocol was used in the October 2012 executions of Donald Eugene Moeller and Eric Donald Robert, that were witnessed by the media.

“The Court’s decision affirms that the state has taken precautions in drafting and implementing its lethal injection protocol to assure that it meets constitutional requirements,” said Jackley. “Today’s decision is an important step forward in carrying out the jury and court’s decision and holding Charles Rhines accountable for his horrific actions from over 20 years ago.”

Woodrow Wilcox


Rhines can appeal Judge Trimble’s decision to the South Dakota Supreme Court and then to the federal courts.

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.



Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Newswire articles originate from a variety of sources including wire services, press releases and more. Newswire pieces are written by a representative of the person or organization that is the subject or source of the article and are presented as informational statements about the subject discussed.
View all articles by Newswire

Comments are closed.