Liberal: It’s Pro-Science to Abort Genetically Imperfect Children

You thought eugenics was a thing of the past, just an aberration held to by Margaret Sanger and her Planned Parenthood types, and socialist types like Adolf Hitler.

Eugenics is far from dead, and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) admitted it before he sold his soul to ObamaCare. It’s already going on with the massive number of abortions of children with Down syndrome, and it isn’t a passive campaign either.

In the name of “science,” many on the Left are very eager to eradicate innocent human life that they find “inconvenient” or “unattractive.”

This is what you can easily fall into when you start flirting with liberalism and the liberals who promote their morally bankrupt agenda.


5 Comments

  1. Carrie_K_Hutchens says:

    Defects aren’t necessarily diseases! What next? People who might have to wear glasses should be aborted?

    • Bob Ellis says:

      Why not? They are genetically flawed, after all. Science without a firm moral foundation gets pretty scary pretty quick, doesn’t it?

      • Carrie_K_Hutchens says:

        Indeed it does!

        • Carrie_K_Hutchens says:

          “First They Came for the Jews”

          By Pastor Niemoller
          First they came for the Jews and I did not speak
          out because I was not a Jew…
          * * * * * * * * * * *
          Once upon a time, the people were born. Now, they can’t wait for their victims to get out of the womb to kill ’em off.

          Today it is the Down Syndrome baby — tomorrow it could be you and yours because you aren’t perfect enough for those in control of the “Death to the Defectives Panel”.

  2. dr. theo says:

    90% of Down Syndrome babies are aborted, yet every family I have ever known with such a special child have considered them to be a wonderful blessing in their lives. We are incapable of deciding what life is or is not worth living. The very concept of “eugenics” presumes an understanding and insight beyond our capacities.