By John Vinci
Americans for Limited Government
Imagine that, in order to increase competition among grocery stores, the government created local farmers’ markets all across the country. Anyone could sell food within these farmers’ markets — including the grocery stores. But when the grocery stores refused to participate, the government enacted regulations to force them to do so. Thus, what was meant to encourage competition instead became the means of suppressing it.
Similarly, the Obama Administration has signaled that it may create new regulations in order to protect Obamacare’s online health insurance marketplaces called Health Insurance Exchanges. Despite Obama’s promise that if you like your health plan you can keep it, some small businesses may not be able to keep their self-insured health plans if the Obama Administration has its way.
Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a Request for Information (RFI) notice in the Federal Register signaling that the Obama Administration may regulate small, self-insured health plans, making it difficult or impossible for small businesses to insure their employee’s health benefits themselves instead of purchasing a plan from an insurance company.
An increasing percentage of American workers obtain their health insurance from employers who self-insure their employees’ health benefits by assuming the risk of paying their employees’ health claims.
Self-insurance is attractive to businesses because it provides them the flexibility to design their own health plan. Plus, many employers find it a less expensive alternative to purchasing health insurance from an insurance company. And, while self-insured plans are subject to federal regulation, federal law prohibits states from regulating them.
Large employers that self-insure have the personnel to manage the plan and can spread their risk between their many employees. But small employers typically hire an outside, third-party expert to manage their self-insured plan. They also purchase stop-loss insurance to protect themselves from the potential of unusually high health claims.
For example, a small company might be willing to pay a limit of up to an average of $20,000 per employee for health claims in a year. But that company might be ruined financially if claims in a particular year spike too high. To protect itself, that company, then could purchase stop-loss insurance to reimburse them should their actual spending on health claims surpass a certain limit. That limit is called an “attachment point.” It is the point at which the stop-loss insurance plan kicks in and reimburses the employer for claims it pays over a chosen limit.
Stop-loss plans can have attachment points that are low enough to make it feasible for small businesses to accept the risk of implementing their own self-insured health plan.
While subject to many of Obamacare’s new mandates, self-insured plans are not subject to the Essential Health Benefits, risk pooling, risk adjustment, rate review, or medical loss ratio mandates.
This concerns liberal “consumer advocates” like Professor Timothy Jost of Washington and Lee University School of Law. Jost calls self-insurance a “loophole” in Obamacare. Jost and other Obamacare ideologues have called on the Obama Administration to use its regulatory powers to close this so-called “loophole.”
Their particular concern is that self-insured plans with low attachment points are a risk to Obamacare’s Exchange marketplaces. Now HHS, in its RFI is echoing this concern.
For this reason, we expect that the information collected from the RFI will be the basis of a future regulation. We further expect that such a future regulation may regulate self-insured plans with stop-loss insurance and thereby may attempt to make it difficult or impossible for small businesses to self-insure.
The problem with government-created marketplaces is that the government feels obligated to protect them — even at the expense of competition and market alternatives.
John Vinci is a staff attorney with Americans for Limited Government and is the editor in chief for the www.obamacarewatcher.org website.
* * *
 Request for Information Regarding Stop Loss Insurance, 77 Fed. Reg. 25,788 (May 1, 2012) available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-05-01/pdf/2012-10441.pdf.
 Michael J. Brien and Constantijn W.A. Panis, Deloitte, Self-Insured Health Benefit Plans 5 (Mar. 23, 2011) available at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/ACASelfFundedHealthPlansReport032811.pdf.
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a) (2011).
Timothy Jost, Loopholes in the Affordable Care Act: Regulatory Gaps and Border Crossing Techniques and How to Address Them, 5 St. Louis Univ. J. of Health L. & Pol’y 27, 77.
 Id. at 79-81.
Id. at 80-81. See also Kathryn Linehan, Self-Insurance and the Potential Effects of Health Reform on the Small- Group Market, Issue Brief 840, National Health Policy Forum (Dec. 21, 2010) available at http://www.nhpf.org/library/issue-briefs/ IB840_PPACASmallGroup_12-21-10.pdf; Russell B. Korobkin, The Battle Over Self-Insured Health Plans, or ’One Good Loophole Deserves Another’, 1 Yale J. of Health Pol’y, L., & Ethics 89–136 (2005); and Mark A. Hall, Regulating Stop-Loss Coverage May Be Needed to Deter Self-Insuring Small Employers From Undermining Market Reforms, 31 Health Affairs 316–323 (2012).
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
- SOS: Speaking of Seniors – ObamaCare Hurting Workers, Businesses
- ‘Keep Your Health Plan Act’ Still Doesn’t Fix Everyone
- 102 Million With Employer Coverage May Lose Existing Plans
- Ted Cruz: What’s Coming Next With ObamaCare
- Don’t Waste Tears On The Insurance Industry
Subscribe by Email
Sign up to receive the daily American Clarion article digest, with links to articles.
Recent American Clarion Articles
- The Myth of ‘Race’
It’s often said, “There is only one race – the human race.” While the phrase has become almost cliché in repetition, it happens to be 100 percent accurate, both scientifically and theologically
- Americans: So Easily Controlled
I ask, is it honorable to live for idols while turning your back to those who fought, bled and died to give us the freedoms in which Americans enjoy? What a disgrace and a shame
- State admits: Islamic State Terrorists Trying to Pose as Refugees
State Department spokesman John Kirby acknowledged Wednesday that Islamic State terrorists are trying to mingle with refugee populations overseas in the hopes of making it to the U.S. posing as a
- Obama Boom Builds Obamatowns
According to the megaphones of the Progressive-controlled media, the Obama economy is booming. For the investor class, it has been a rising tide that lifts all yachts or as it is expressed in Bloomberg, “When President Barack Obama was elected in November 2008, the U.S. economy was shrinking
- Candidates on the South Dakota GOP Platform, Part 4
Read Part 1 here, Part 2 here, and Part 3 here. With the election coming up in South Dakota and a large crop of Republicans running for the state’s many legislative seats, people are interested in whether these representatives can be relied on to uphold Republican values and principles. As we
- Will YOU Allow Obama to Give Away U.S. Oversight of the Internet to Countries like Russia, China, Iran…?
We all like the Internet right? The ease (ok sometimes) with which we can look up information, read a book, watch a movie, or even buy stuff. The Internet is a supremely useful tool in the lives of many people. The Internet is now so common that it is no different then having a TV or a microwave,
- Candidates on the South Dakota GOP Platform, Part 3
With the election coming up in South Dakota and a large crop of Republicans running for the state's many legislative seats, people are interested in whether these representatives can be relied on to uphold Republican values and principles.
- retiredday: Bolstering citations used in this article, is something Ben Kinchlow wrote in his book, Black Yellow Dogs:……
- Bob Ellis: Sure, Cruz's endorsement of Trump is a great disappointment. Still, he held out far longer than just about any……
- JamesBradshaw: Now that Ted Cruz has gotten behind Trump, are you finally going to acknowledge that he may not be as……
- Public_Citizen: Wasn't it Albert Einstein that stated that "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different……
- Thisoldspouse: But we're supposed to keep doing the same thing again.…
- Thisoldspouse: No, a tax break for killing a domestic terrorist. Only a racist sees racism when it is not an……
- DCM7: "Obamatown"? Add it to the list! http://www.americanclarion.com/2013/01/24/new-terms-in-honor-of-the-president-16704/…
- retiredday: The laws and rulings referred to here need to be challenged in the Supreme Court -- just one more reason……
- Public_Citizen: Since the beginning of "The War on Poverty" this nation has spent a sum on public benefits roughly equal to……
- Revolution76: A tax break for killing a black? Maybe that's why blacks keep doing it to other blacks in all……