By John Vinci
Americans for Limited Government
Imagine that, in order to increase competition among grocery stores, the government created local farmers’ markets all across the country. Anyone could sell food within these farmers’ markets — including the grocery stores. But when the grocery stores refused to participate, the government enacted regulations to force them to do so. Thus, what was meant to encourage competition instead became the means of suppressing it.
Similarly, the Obama Administration has signaled that it may create new regulations in order to protect Obamacare’s online health insurance marketplaces called Health Insurance Exchanges. Despite Obama’s promise that if you like your health plan you can keep it, some small businesses may not be able to keep their self-insured health plans if the Obama Administration has its way.
Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a Request for Information (RFI) notice in the Federal Register signaling that the Obama Administration may regulate small, self-insured health plans, making it difficult or impossible for small businesses to insure their employee’s health benefits themselves instead of purchasing a plan from an insurance company.
An increasing percentage of American workers obtain their health insurance from employers who self-insure their employees’ health benefits by assuming the risk of paying their employees’ health claims.
Self-insurance is attractive to businesses because it provides them the flexibility to design their own health plan. Plus, many employers find it a less expensive alternative to purchasing health insurance from an insurance company. And, while self-insured plans are subject to federal regulation, federal law prohibits states from regulating them.
Large employers that self-insure have the personnel to manage the plan and can spread their risk between their many employees. But small employers typically hire an outside, third-party expert to manage their self-insured plan. They also purchase stop-loss insurance to protect themselves from the potential of unusually high health claims.
For example, a small company might be willing to pay a limit of up to an average of $20,000 per employee for health claims in a year. But that company might be ruined financially if claims in a particular year spike too high. To protect itself, that company, then could purchase stop-loss insurance to reimburse them should their actual spending on health claims surpass a certain limit. That limit is called an “attachment point.” It is the point at which the stop-loss insurance plan kicks in and reimburses the employer for claims it pays over a chosen limit.
Stop-loss plans can have attachment points that are low enough to make it feasible for small businesses to accept the risk of implementing their own self-insured health plan.
While subject to many of Obamacare’s new mandates, self-insured plans are not subject to the Essential Health Benefits, risk pooling, risk adjustment, rate review, or medical loss ratio mandates.
This concerns liberal “consumer advocates” like Professor Timothy Jost of Washington and Lee University School of Law. Jost calls self-insurance a “loophole” in Obamacare. Jost and other Obamacare ideologues have called on the Obama Administration to use its regulatory powers to close this so-called “loophole.”
Their particular concern is that self-insured plans with low attachment points are a risk to Obamacare’s Exchange marketplaces. Now HHS, in its RFI is echoing this concern.
For this reason, we expect that the information collected from the RFI will be the basis of a future regulation. We further expect that such a future regulation may regulate self-insured plans with stop-loss insurance and thereby may attempt to make it difficult or impossible for small businesses to self-insure.
The problem with government-created marketplaces is that the government feels obligated to protect them — even at the expense of competition and market alternatives.
John Vinci is a staff attorney with Americans for Limited Government and is the editor in chief for the www.obamacarewatcher.org website.
* * *
 Request for Information Regarding Stop Loss Insurance, 77 Fed. Reg. 25,788 (May 1, 2012) available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-05-01/pdf/2012-10441.pdf.
 Michael J. Brien and Constantijn W.A. Panis, Deloitte, Self-Insured Health Benefit Plans 5 (Mar. 23, 2011) available at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/ACASelfFundedHealthPlansReport032811.pdf.
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a) (2011).
Timothy Jost, Loopholes in the Affordable Care Act: Regulatory Gaps and Border Crossing Techniques and How to Address Them, 5 St. Louis Univ. J. of Health L. & Pol’y 27, 77.
 Id. at 79-81.
Id. at 80-81. See also Kathryn Linehan, Self-Insurance and the Potential Effects of Health Reform on the Small- Group Market, Issue Brief 840, National Health Policy Forum (Dec. 21, 2010) available at http://www.nhpf.org/library/issue-briefs/ IB840_PPACASmallGroup_12-21-10.pdf; Russell B. Korobkin, The Battle Over Self-Insured Health Plans, or ’One Good Loophole Deserves Another’, 1 Yale J. of Health Pol’y, L., & Ethics 89–136 (2005); and Mark A. Hall, Regulating Stop-Loss Coverage May Be Needed to Deter Self-Insuring Small Employers From Undermining Market Reforms, 31 Health Affairs 316–323 (2012).
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
- ‘Keep Your Health Plan Act’ Still Doesn’t Fix Everyone
- 102 Million With Employer Coverage May Lose Existing Plans
- Ted Cruz: What’s Coming Next With ObamaCare
- Don’t Waste Tears On The Insurance Industry
- State Momentum Against ObamaCare Grows
Subscribe by Email
Sign up to receive the daily American Clarion article digest, with links to articles.
Recent American Clarion Articles
- Do They Really Report and We Decide?
Americans will get the president they deserve. Like children, most Americans expect someone else to take care of them. They expect entities such as government, political parties, insurance companies or financial institutions to provide them prosperity, security, physical safety, comfort and
- Putting the Bite Back In Article 1
Restoring Congress’ Article I power of the purse is exactly what the doctor ordered to fix what ails Washington, D.C. Which is an out-of-control executive branch and its many agencies that have grown far beyond what the Framers of the Constitution intended or ever envisioned in
- Iowa Proof: Beloved Hillary Clinton Melts Hearts & Gain Votes
The long awaited Iowa caucus has come and gone. Hillary Clinton set the rooms on fire and became the beloved one that melted hearts and gained the majority of votes. Well, maybe not so much
- South Dakota Legislative Billwatch, Feb. 5, 2016
Several important bills will be considered by the South Dakota Legislature today, including bills dealing with concealed carry, civil asset forfeiture, prohibiting abortion of pain-capable unborn children, and a corporate income tax for South
- Recognizing Reagan’s Birthday
Tomorrow, February 6, 2016, would have been Ronald Reagan's 105th birthday. If you're in or around Rapid City tomorrow around 9am, come to the Pizza Ranch on the south side of town, off 5th Street near the new Wal-Mart, and join Mark the Freedom Poet as conservatives recognize the life and
- Better Red Than Ted
Does Bernie Sanders have a chance? It is hard to run against Santa Clause, and for those who have imbibed of the Sanders Kool Aide, it might just be, “Better red than
- South Dakota Legislative Billwatch, Feb. 4, 2016
Some of the bills being considered by the South Dakota Legislature Thursday Feb. 4 include one that would protect scientific integrity in the classroom, as well as one repealing the prohibition against carrying a concealed weapon in the
- Thisoldspouse: I am utterly speechless how any conservative can support this.…
- Bob Ellis: For some reason, the numbers are getting covered by an ad. The formatting isn't cooperating well. Here's what they……
- retiredday: What happened to 4-6?…
- Gyst53: See any similarities from Paul's warning to our behavior today? The apostle Paul similarly foretold the overall self-seeking mind-set……
- Thisoldspouse: LOL!!! Freedom of choice - for leftists. For conservatives, not so much when it comes to school choice,……
- WXRGina: AFV, your obtuseness and senseless insults against us are wearing quite thin. You clearly have no interest in truth……
- Bob Ellis: Spoiled children worry about "you lost" rather than facts and morality. I don't know your age, but try to……
- DCM7: "There's not enough of you to turn back the time to back alley abortions." You think that's what we want?……
- Bob Ellis: Do you know what "fetus" really means? It means "offspring of a mammal," or to go back further, the Latin……
- DCM7: Your entire argument is boiling down to nothing more than name-calling. You sound as if you're not really reading the……