Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., chairman of the House Budget Committee, provoked some angry pushback when he claimed that not only is his proposed sweeping revamp of the U.S. budget fiscally sound but also morally sound.
In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Ryan said he drew inspiration from his Catholic faith.
He argued that Catholic priority for caring for the poor should focus on helping folks move out of poverty: “Don’t make people dependent on government so they stay stuck in their station in life.”
Catholics criticizing Ryan don’t see it this way. They see him cutting back on welfare programs that focus on the needy.
But this is not a new debate, and it’s not limited to Catholics. Those on the religious left of all religious persuasions have long been criticizing religious conservatives, claiming they’re indifferent to poverty and care only about abortion and homosexuality.
It’s a critical discussion for our nation today and Ryan deserves credit for casting his proposed reforms in moral as well as economic terms. It provides the opportunity to challenge today’s conventional wisdom that morality and economy are separate universes having little to do with each other.
It’s not true.
I can speak from personal experience going back to my years on welfare. The intent of federal welfare programs might have been to help the poor, but they caused far more damage than benefit.
When you tell a poor mother that, to qualify for her check, she must demonstrate she is single, not working and has no savings, what are the chances she’ll get married, look for a job and put money in the bank? When this goes on for generations, what do you think this does to a community? (Congress aimed to reverse the disincentives with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 — welfare reform — which set minimum work requirements and promoted marriage.)
It’s no accident that in 1960, according to the Pew Research Center, five years before President Lyndon Johnson signed into law his War on Poverty, 61 percent of black adults were married. By 2008, this was down to 32 percent. In 1960, 2 percent of black children had a parent that had never been married. By 2008, this was up to 41 percent.
Social Security‘s Board of Trustees just issued a devastating annual report. It projected the system going into the red in 2035, three years earlier than predicted last year. The system’s long-term unfunded liabilities — the amount by which projected obligations exceed projected revenues — are $8.6 trillion, more than half the size of the entire U.S. economy.
Discussions about how to fix the system focus on numbers and accounting. But the numbers are symptoms, not causes.
The Social Security payments that current retirees get are from the payroll taxes that current workers pay. What is driving the system into bankruptcy is the shrinking number of those working per retiree. In 1950, the average was 16.5 workers per retiree. Now it is 2.9. The trustees report projects it will be down to just two workers for every retiree by 2035.
One major factor is we’re having fewer children. Fertility rates — the average number of births per woman — have fallen dramatically. According to the United Nations, the average U.S. fertility rate from 2005 to 2010 was 40 percent lower than during 1950 to 1955.
John Mueller of the Ethics and Public Policy Center argues convincingly of the major impact of legal abortion to this dramatic drop in the ratio of workers to retirees.
To solve our national crisis, we need to sort out symptoms from causes. The bankruptcy of our entitlement programs is the symptom.
The cause is loss of individual freedom and breakdown of values, personal responsibility and marriage caused by entitlement culture materialism.
Paul Ryan is right to see this in moral terms. We must change, and all change begins with character and personal transformation.
- Bishops: Rep. Ryan’s Budget Plan Fails to Meet Moral Criteria(newsmax.com)
- Rep. Paul Ryan discusses his Catholic faith and his budget at Georgetown University(dailycaller.com)
- Paul Ryan: My budget is morally sound, informed by faith(dailycaller.com)
- Rep. Ryan: My Budget Plan Will ‘Eradicate Poverty’(newsmax.com)
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
- GOP Adding More to the Welfare Rolls?
- Paul Ryan has answer for Ferguson
- American Values Can Deal With Poverty
- The problem is liberalism, not racism
- Budget crisis has its roots in erosion of values
Subscribe by Email
Sign up to receive the daily American Clarion article digest, with links to articles.
Recent American Clarion Articles
- AFA Ditches PayPal After PayPal Ditches North Carolina
American Family Association has announced that the pro-family organization is partnering with Cornerstone Payment Systems® as its preferred credit card processing provider. After PayPal announced it sought to punish the state of North Carolina for passing a law requiring men and women to visit the
- The Puritans, Part 2
In order for the Puritans to get their own colony, they would have to get their charter processed through Parliament and signed by the king without the king noticing that there was no mention of where the company’s meetings were to be held.
- Terri Haverly: Raising Your Taxes
I received this mailer today about South Dakota Senator Terri Haverly's votes for higher taxes. Being in her district, District 35, I'm more than familiar with her
- America’s Number One Enemy: Barack Obama
When you think of the United States, and the gravest danger we face as a country and a people, what or whom comes to mind? ISIS, or maybe Iran or North Korea – since they all threaten to wipe the great Satan off the face off the Earth? Maybe it’s Russian aggression or the supposed climate
- Obama’s New Neck Wear
I understand that new neck wear is being prepared for President Obama in light of his administration’s actions on May 13th of this year. It is not a fancy silk neck tie, no nor is it an expensive gold chain, it is, well… Let’s let Jesus describe it. Turn to Matthew 18:6.
- States Strike Back Against Obama Transgender Agenda
AOL News reports 11 states have decided not to roll over for President Barack Obama's illegal attempt to force the transgender states on America's education system. Why aren't there more, since there are 31 Republican
- The Puritans, Part 1
The Puritans were people who wanted to purify the Church of England from within. For years they stayed and tried to do just that. There were some positive benefits from
- Kevin: I have to disagree with you David. Jesus said "it would be better...". What lays in store for this "distinguished"……
- [email protected]: How would vote on such a bill regarding NR waterfowl hunters HB 1075 Purpose: Revise the area for certain……
- retiredday: I love Star Parker! Like her, all true believers need to keep telling it like it is. Speak……
- Bob Ellis: He badly needs someone to explain to him that you can't kill something that's already dead. In other words, what……
- Hartbreaker: I just got a bill that was partially paid for by my insurance months ago. They said they have not……
- Hartbreaker: I know one guy who defends the right to an abortion with vehemence and passion (insults and emotions, no rationality……
- Bob Ellis: There are LOTS people who think as I do. Unfortunately, most of them tend to allow themselves to be……
- Bob Ellis: Because several state GOP parties were amazingly stupid enough to allow their primaries to be open to the public regardless……
- thriver7: PS I missed you - so happy Disqus showed your last words to me on our previous discussion. (Seriously……
- thriver7: So how exactly did democrats get the right to elect a member of your party? Why would any party……