Crooked Democrats Block Voter ID Laws to Cheat

Listen to the Radio Blog broadcast of this column

Install Microsoft Silverlight

Voter ID laws in the US.  Red is more strict while lighter colors are more loosely regulated.

Voter ID laws in the US. Red is more strict while lighter colors are more loosely regulated. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

At this point, anyone who does not see that we are living under a communist dictatorship of the current administration in Washington is woefully ignorant or willfully blind.  One of the latest outrages against America’s free and sovereign states has—no surprise—come at the hands of the lawless Department of Justice (DOJ).  The DOJ, under the racist Eric Holder, has made a mockery of its own name, because there is no justice in that department.  It has become nothing more than a strong-arm, thug tool for Barack Obama (or whatever his name is).

This week, the DOJ blocked Texas’ voter identification law, falsely claiming it would be a burden to Hispanic people in the state.  The DOJ used an antiquated section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as an excuse to block the law.  Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, certain southern states must get the approval of the DOJ before making any changes to their voting laws.  This was put in place back in 1965 to prevent historical practices by some states, mainly in the South, that had thwarted black people’s ability to vote.

Ted Cruz 2016


There is no longer any need for such a clause, because no one in this country who is legal to vote is prevented from voting—no one.  Nevertheless, back in 2006, President George W. Bush signed a 25-year extension of that outdated clause, but even if he had not, the DOJ still would have dictated that Texas not enforce its own voter ID law, which was approved by the citizens of the State of Texas.  You see, under this lawless administration, they do not need an excuse, like Section 5, to impose their dictatorial will on the states.  They know that no one in Congress or the military will oppose them, because apparently, no one in authority has any guts to hold these criminals—from Obama on down—accountable for their illegal, unconstitutional, impeachable actions.

The simple question here is why do Democrats so viciously oppose common-sense voter ID laws?  The simple answer is that Democrats, and even some so-called Republicans, cheat in elections.  They have to cheat, because their communist ideology is diametrically opposed to the freedom and individualism that the majority of Americans cherish.  Most Americans understand that communistic policies rob our freedom, our money and our way of life, and we want nothing to do with such monstrous dictates.  Communism centralizes all the power of a nation into the hands of a tyrannical oligarchy which dictates every aspect of the citizens’ lives.  We are now almost all the way there.

Not only do Democrats cheat, but they lie about the existence of election fraud.  Their common refrain is that there is no such thing as election fraud, a ridiculous claim on its surface.  When there is criminal activity in every conceivable place in our world, how can they make the stupid claim that when it comes to voting, there is no criminal activity?  Well, because they lie, and they do not hesitate to tell the most outlandish whoppers imaginable.  Considering the massive amount of power that is at stake in elections, only a fool would believe that election and voter fraud does not occur.

Woodrow Wilcox


Of course, in order to make the statement that election fraud does most certainly occur, I should at least provide some examples.  First, I want to make a note that diabolical, billionaire currency-wrecker, George Soros, created the “Secretary of State Project” back in 2006, in which he is attempting to install Democrats in the position of secretary of state all across our nation.  As you know, among other duties, secretaries of state are the overseers of elections, candidate qualifications and election results, and they are able to manipulate state voter registration laws which can make election fraud easier (as in the case of allowing same-day registration and voting).  Thus, Soros and his gang of globalist commies are worming their henchmen into these powerful positions.  If there is no such thing as election fraud, why would Soros do this?

One of the latest, high-profile cases of election fraud was perpetrated by a Republican Secretary of State in Indiana.  He was convicted in early February of this year of multiple felony counts and sentenced to a year of home detention.  Since this was a Republican, you can easily find numerous stories on the Internet reported by the “mainstream” media.  Election fraud by the Left is harder to find covered by these same media outlets, but it can be found with just a little bit of effort.

Also from Indiana back this past December was the case of the state chairman of the Democrat party having resigned as a result of election fraud stemming from the signatures to get Barack Obama on the ballot in the 2008 election.  500 signatures are required, and in this case 534 signatures were collected, but 150 of those signatures are declared to be forgeries.

The same article quotes a former Alabama Democrat representative, who is black, saying that voter fraud is rampant in the black districts like the one he used to represent.

There were many examples of election fraud stemming from the 2008 presidential election which saw a fraud installed in the White House.  The group Minnesota Majority reported on more than a hundred voter fraud convictions stemming from the 2008 election with almost 3,000 convicted felons and otherwise suspected ineligible voters having voted, as well.  The website Rotten Acorn has a huge list of election fraud convictions and allegations relating not just to the 2008 elections, but dating back to 1998.

The fact is that election fraud does occur, and although it is not limited to the communist Democrats, it is on the Left that the majority of election fraud happens.  You will notice that it is only the Left that loudly clamors against voter ID laws.  That is because having to present identification to vote to prove you are who you say you are greatly reduces the Left’s ability to cheat in elections.

Another grim and disturbing prospect in the upcoming presidential election is the fact that Obama’s Department of Energy conducted “research” through the Argonne Laboratory that showed the amazing ease with which electronic voting machines could be remotely hacked and the voting results changed—undetectably.  Isn’t that just swell?!

Let’s not forget that the United States’ dominant election results reporting company, SOE, has been sold to a globalist election reporting company out of Barcelona called Scytl.  This means that the election results for 525U.S. jurisdictions and counting will be redirected through this foreign company before Americans can see them.

As reported by the website, Black Box Voting,

“A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape [and] photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won’t work (if SCYTL’s voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own “audit” by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, … or the count.”

Oh, there’s not a chance of election fraud in any of this!  Yeah, right.

The bottom line here is that we are dealing with a power-mad man in the White House who has an almost supernaturally-powerful machine propping him up and moving the world for him.  He is also greatly disliked because of his lawlessness and America-destroying policies.  I do not believe there is any way he could legitimately win reelection.  I do not even believe the polling data that claims that about half of America approves of Obama.  I don’t believe it for a minute.

In order for him to be “reelected,” there will have to be a massive collusion of all of the above to undertake the most brazen election theft in American history.  Between the foot soldier voter fraudsters on the ground, remote voting machine hacks, and who-knows-what kind of trickery that might occur as the votes of the American people are reported by foreigners, the prospect is breathtaking.

With all of this potential election wickedness, the communist Democrats in Obama’s Justice Department are desperately trying to prevent states from helping to ensure the integrity of elections with voter ID laws and anti-illegal alien legislation.  The two issues go hand-in-hand, of course, since illegal alien voters are Democrat sweethearts.

The Democrats are flat-out lying when they say requiring proof of identification hurts minority voters.  That is a crock of bull.  Every American must show ID for a myriad of reasons, including to board a plane, to open a bank account, and to sign up for government taxpayer money handouts (the Left has no problems with that one, though).  The Left never mentions the obvious fact that we all have to show ID regularly to live and work in this country; instead, they lie and say voter ID would prevent minorities from voting.

One point about this that I noted in one of my January columns titled, “Voter ID Laws are like Sunlight to the Vampire Left,”

“If voter ID laws were enacted in all states, it is likely that overall voter turnout would be lower, mainly on the Democrat side, of course. That is simply the result of all those dead and otherwise illegal voters not being able to cast their lawless Democrat votes.

… Dead voters remain on the voter rolls in every state. Purging of voter rolls of dead people and otherwise ineligible voters (as in those who have moved out of the district or state) is part of what needs to happen on a very regular basis to further prevent voter fraud. Of course, the Left fights any kind of effort to clean up the election process, and purging voter rolls is another thing the Left detests.”

It is time for the states to stand up and tell this Obama regime to take a hike.  We need to enforce the state voter ID laws and anti-illegal immigration laws we pass whether the commie Obama and his buddies like it or not.  Make the DOJ put its money where its mouth is, and see if they can stop us.

This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.

Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.

Similar Posts:

Gina Miller, a native of Texas and current resident of the Mississippi Gulf Coast, is a radio/television voice professional.
Gina Miller
View all articles by Gina Miller
Leave a comment with your Facebook login
Print Friendly


  • thisoldspouse

    The Voter Rights Act needs to be done away with because it is no long used for anything other than a tool of contempt for the rule of law by Marxists.  It is now a blank check, ready to contain anything the Left considers “discrimination.”  And so, now, a police car parked in the general vicinity of a polling place is called “discrimination.”  Purging voter roles of dead, non-citizen, or otherwise ineligible voters is considered “discrimination.”  Not providing ballots in Swahili is considered “discrimination.”

    When’s the civil war going to begin?  It’s way past time.

    • retiredday

      …perhaps when those of us who see ourselves as free protest the fraudulent election results that Keep Obama (OWHNI) in office for another year… perhaps when martial law is declared and troops are sent out to detain those of us who “doth protest too much”…

      I hope to God it doesn’t come to that.  But it seems as if there’s an awful lot of people just sitting around, waiting for that to happen.  I’m sure the so-called news media and those in political power will thrill at such an opportunity.  Every down side has an up side.

  • Jdragonflylady2000

    I just don’t know how much more “We The People” are going to tolerate. Everytime we think we are getting somewhere it falls through. These crooks have covered it all!! So, I don’t have to prove I’m who I am when I go to the polls….ain’t that just lovely. I guess a bunch of dead people will be voting again this year. And the ones who are alive and for real, must have a dead head if they vote for what’s his name. 
    Gina, hold your head HIgh lady. You are the best and you are good at it. Ha!
    God Bless you and American Clarion!

  • dr. theo

    Every fraudulent vote denies an American citizen his or her voting rights.  Millions of Americans lose their voice in this Republic every election.  Isn’t this a civil rights issue, Mr. Holder?  Many more Americans are denied the franchise in this way than in the phony accusations of “discrimination.”
    See “Battle of Athens” to learn what we can do about it.

  • Bob Ellis

    So it was a little too much truth and clear identification of bad behavior for a “fair minded” person to handle, then? In othe words, “fair minded” people can’t handle too much moral clarity up front?

  • WXRGina

    Actually, Don, there is quite a bit of difference between my piece and things you might find at Soros’ Daily Kook–my piece is the truth.

    I’m sorry you disapprove of my “tone,” but our country is in a very bad place, a critical place, and the time for “playing pretty” is long over. Anyone who would be put off by my very correct characterization of the enemies within our country is not likely to be swayed by softer words instead. I’m telling it like it is, because things are not looking good for America, and people need to wake up–it may already be too late.

    Mr. Goldwater reminds us, “I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!”

    • thisoldspouse

       I thought you were rather restrained in your essay, Gina.  There cannot be enough passion expressed about the perversion of our County’s principles that we are seeing now.

      • WXRGina

        I agree, Spouse.  You know leftists hate it when we call them out for the communists they are.  They hate it when we call a Democrat dictatorship a dictatorship.  I have no intention of toning down the truth.

        • thisoldspouse

           And neither do I.  Discussions on our local paper’s website are getting heated, as this topic gets posted, and I have been “deleted” by our “fair and balanced” Marxist rag on more than one occasion.