Social Security benefits can represent a big stack of cash. A typical monthly benefit of $2,200 has a present value well over $500,000. Consider all your Social Security options carefully to avoid making a costly mistake.
Like all government law, Social Security is not a simple piece of legislation. Since the Social Security Act became law in 1935, hundreds of amendments have added to the complexity. To make the best decision, you must consider health, income before retirement, income during retirement and taxes.
Retirees cannot rely on commonly held beliefs. Don’t assume that simplistic rules such as “Always file for early benefits” or “You need to stop working to receive benefits” are correct. Specific cases break every rule of thumb. And these one-size-fits-all answers leave many retirees failing to maximize the benefits they have earned.
The decision is even more critical for women. For 42% of single women older than 62, Social Security is their sole source of income. Women on average outlive men. Thus planning for retirement is much easier for men, who tend to have more assets and die young. Widows are twice as likely to live under the poverty line as men who have lost their wives. And the poverty rate for elderly single women is 23% compared with just 5% for retired couples.
Couples must take their joint longevity into account before either one files for benefits. The person with the longer life expectancy will inherit either a wise or a foolish decision that will last a lifetime. Given that a husband’s benefits are often higher and the wife’s life expectancy longer, each case needs to be analyzed carefully.
Consider for illustration the case of James and Linda Miller. James was born in 1950 and is turning 62 this year. He will receive $2,384 a month at age 66, his full retirement age. Linda is three years younger and expects to receive a smaller benefit.
About three-quarters of Americans file for Social Security benefits before their full retirement age. This mistake is statistically most costly when the husband chooses to begin claiming at age 62. In this case, such a mistake would cost the Millers $152,046 in lifetime income.
Assuming normal life expectancies, Linda should file for benefits at age 63. James will be age 66 at that point and have the opportunity to pursue an often overlooked Social Security loophole. He can choose to file only for his spousal benefit and delay filing on his own benefit until age 70. We call this “File as a Spouse First,” or “FAASF.” You can see the results of this optimal strategy listed in the table. Each box represents the amount of total lifetime benefits that would be sacrificed if James and Linda did not file at their optimal ages.
The box representing when Linda is age 63 and James is age 70 captures the highest lifetime benefit. The highlighted box represents the ideal age combination when James is eligible to begin collecting his FAASF benefit while delaying his personal benefit.
Unfortunately, many people file after considering only one or two isolated options. The Social Security Administration’s new online filing system enables quick decision-making. People can easily submit their request without any professional advice or planning.
But before filing, you obviously should be informed about all the options. To begin, you need to know your personal Social Security earnings and the projected benefits for both you and your spouse. You can request an estimate at www.ssa.gov/estimator and then print the results. Or call the Social Security Administration at 800-772-1213. For a general review of Social Security, start by reading “Retirement Benefits” (Publication No. 05-10035) online.
Social Security planning is crucial for everyone. People with significant assets should carefully consider both the lifetime benefits and tax consequences of Social Security in light of their overall portfolio strategy. For the less well off, Social Security benefits will dictate their retirement lifestyle. Proper planning could well determine what they can afford to eat.
This article is printed with the permission of the author(s). Opinions expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of American Clarion or Dakota Voice LLC.
Comment Rules: Please confine comments to salient ones that add to the topic; Profanity is not allowed and will be deleted; Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will be deleted.
- Social Security and Your Safe Withdrawal Rate
- Give low-income earners exit from Social Security
- Is Social Security Stealing Your Chance Of Being A Millionaire?
- Christie’s Social Security reform hurts America, particularly minorities
- Give low income Americans exit option from Social Security
Subscribe by Email
Sign up to receive the daily American Clarion article digest, with links to articles.
Recent American Clarion Articles
- The Puritans, Part 1
The Puritans were people who wanted to purify the Church of England from within. For years they stayed and tried to do just that. There were some positive benefits from
- On the Issues: Rick Kriebel
American Clarion recently submitted a list of questions to Rick Kriebel, a fresh candidate for the South Dakota Senate in District 32. These questions focused primarily on bills that were considered in the 2016 legislative session, to develop an idea of how the candidate might have voted on these
- Forced Secularism Replacing Religious Freedom
The civil rights movement became unmoored from the religious and moral values that drove it to begin with. Government became its god and the values of secular humanism, with right and wrong defined by politicians, displaced
- SOS: Speaking of Seniors – Suspected, Not Proven
Medicare officials admit that there is fraud in the Medicare system. But, either they don’t know where to look, or they don’t want to look where they might find some sneaky and politically connected parties committing the fraud. I’d really like to tell Medicare officials and Congress a few
- Oklahoma’s Senator Nathan Dahm: ‘The Hell-Hound of Abortion’
Oklahoma Senator Nathan Dahm is likely to override a veto of Governor Mary Fallin who rejected a bill that would make it a felony for anyone to perform an abortion in the state of Oklahoma. This senator’s fearless zeal for life is refreshingly similar to President John Quincy Adams, nicknamed
- On the Issues: Janette McIntyre
American Clarion recently submitted a list of questions to Janette McIntyre, a fresh candidate for the South Dakota Senate in District 34 . These questions focused primarily on bills that were considered in the 2016 legislative session, to develop an idea of how the candidate might have voted on
- On the Issues for South Dakota: Travis Lasseter
American Clarion recently submitted a list of questions to new candidates for the South Dakota Legislature in 2016. These questions focused primarily on bills that were considered in the 2016 legislative session, to develop an idea of how the candidate might have voted on these issues, were they
- DCM7: "I think most people who do support legal abortion are nevertheless uncomfortable with it" There are always those, though……
- Bob Ellis: Sadly, you are very correct.…
- WWEL2: "There is only one answer. Keeping the heavy hand of government as limited as possible in the public square." That……
- JamesBradshaw: I think most people who do support legal abortion are nevertheless uncomfortable with it. If their daughter came home and……
- Bob Ellis: I went through that approx. 23 years ago. It was a terrible thing to have to face the fact that……
- DCM7: One of the comments sums it up nicely: "These people have to use euphemisms. To face what abortion……
- Bob Ellis: Heard about that. Very sad.…
- JamesBradshaw: Interesting story: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/oh-my-god-this-fetus-is-moving/…
- Bob Ellis: Many conservatives are now of a mind to win at all costs, even if it means making a complete mockery……
- Bob Ellis: Because they place absolutely zero value on the conscience. The conscience can be of some value when protecting whales or……